RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2020.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $1800Goal: $3000

Talk:WHO-IAEA conspiracy

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Paws and claws[edit]

(Difference between cats and sentences joke).

'Wide eyed innocent bystander' reads that clause 3 can mean that IAEA has to do the WHO's bidding as well as vice versa (substitute any and all alphabet-soup-organisations). (talk) 15:38, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Clause 3 says they should cooperate. Nothing there says that IAEA can make an executive decision and order WHO not to publish something. --Tweenk (talk) 15:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC)