|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Talk:What the Bleep Do We Know?
|
This Films related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information. |
| ||
|
| ||||
Without a shadow of a doubt, one of the worst films I have ever had the misfortune to see. Mumbo-jumbo and gibberish from the first frame to the last. DogP 02:40, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
This movie is too awful and dangerous (and popular) not to have a longer article. I'm not sure if I'll have time, but I'll try and put together some information about specific claims it makes (such as the happy water BS). - metreoncascade@gmail.com
Expand[edit]
I really want to see some point-by-point refutations rather than just snarky dismissal, but that may require me having to watch it again... I remember one or two points. Namely the assertion that when you're not looking at a basket ball "quantum theory sez" that it's actually everywhere. The stuff towards the end on hormones and biology wasn't too bad if I recall correctly. 
moral 11:48, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
MOAR RAMTHA !!![edit]
We need more Lemurians guiding us , even if he is 35,000 years old. Yoda was kick-ass and he was getting a bit aged. A spirit warrior with the speed and agility of a lemur would be hard to beat. RAM-THA RAM-THA RAM-THA .... 21:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Isn't that one of those anime things? Educated educated Hoover! 21:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ramtha is a spirit god being channeled by some woman. He is a 35,000 year old warrior of Lemuria or atlantis. He has a school and a fan club . [1] if you wish to
lighten your walletexpand your mind. A spirit ninja lemur does sound a bit saturday morning cartoon though Hamster (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ramtha is a spirit god being channeled by some woman. He is a 35,000 year old warrior of Lemuria or atlantis. He has a school and a fan club . [1] if you wish to
Fred Alan Wolf[edit]
the current article has "As an "independent physicist" he does not have the relevant scientific background nor the relevant understanding required to conduct scientific testing and evaluation" the article on wikipedia states he has a phd in theoretical physics i would like to change it reflecting that he has a relevant degree but has spent most of his career in crankhood. i think most editors would agree people can have the degree and still be a crank Nailo1 (talk) 19:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)