There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2020.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Template:Cover abstract/Conservapedia:Conservapedian mathematics
The folks who create Conservapedia's "content" sometimes go off in fascinating directions other than the usual relentless attacks against anything that doesn't fit their strange, right-wing fundamentalist mindset.
In the case of articles relating to science and math, Conservapedia's charter is often less than clear. Their front page seems to specify "educational, clean, and concise entries," and states that it "is rapidly becoming one of the largest and most reliable online educational resources of its kind." But Conservapedia contains no quality technical, or non-technical, articles on mathematics.
In this article RationalWiki recounts the events that led to this state and the fates of those individuals who tried to help.