Template talk:CCOT

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What is this for?--"Shut up, Brx." 02:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

What are you for? AceModerator 02:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
I write the occasional article, make useful minor edits, make useful major edits, and try to improve the atmosphere of the wiki. You are apparently for talking about alcohol and trolling other users.--"Shut up, Brx." 02:50, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
I like the first, second and third one; but the fourth seems to be wrong. --il'Dictator Mikal 02:52, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
I am only interested in improving the atmosFEAR. Ho ho ho...now where was I? Ahh yes, I was talking about alcohol. AceModerator 02:59, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Lol trolling other users. Ace will be your better until the end of your sad days trolling an entire wiki. Contrary to your delusions about yourself, you bring nothing of any real worth to anything you do, Brxbrx. You're completely worthless, and far from improving the atmosphere of a single fucking thing here, you carry with you the fetid miasma of the kind of disgusting human filth that laughs about black men raping white "hambeasts.". When are you finally going to buzz off? Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 02:59, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

CCOT?[edit]

what does CCOT mean? O.o--il'Dictator Mikal 02:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Something something old testament? Peter with added ‼Science‼ 02:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
but... that would be SSOT. --il'Dictator Mikal 02:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Delete[edit]

Useless. ТyrannisAn iron, but caring, fist 12:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Smiteth it verily! Sophiebecause liberals 15:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
I, too, vote for deletion. And as a rider, I vote for implementing anti-trolling rules. We don't have line item vetoes here at RationalWiki, do we?--"Shut up, Brx." 02:30, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
if we had anti-trolling rules you'd have been shoved out the door long ago my friend. AceModerator 02:36, 29 May 2012 (UTC)