Information icon.svg Nominations and campaigning for the RationalWiki 2020 Moderator Election are completed. Voting is live now, until 20:00 UTC, 1 December!

Template talk:Pundits2

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This is just ridiculous. Why not work with the community on template:pundits instead of being as ass? Better yet, write an article on pundits to anchor this whole topic? ħumanUser talk:Human 06:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

You apparently consider yourself 'the community' - when I see more widespread rejection than from your own opinion, I'll realize I need to understand 'the community' and its concerns better. I don't consider you an adequate rep, particularly as you have now resorted to name-calling, which is irrational. --07:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Two templates is just plain unnecessary. - π 07:18, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
The "community" is "other people". I am one of them. So are you. And you. And you. ħumanUser talk:Human 07:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Lets not turn this into the Care Bears. - π 07:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


There is no need for this template. I'd put the template on it but I don't want to make a mess. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Also, no pages link here. Speedy will probably be my approach, does anybody mind? ħumanUser talk:Human 00:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Supportdeletequicknowdoitbeforethedamnredsgetyou! Blue Talk 00:55, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Kill it. --Onion <talk> 00:55, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
We don't need two, but i like the way this one divides up the pundits rather than throwing an alphabetical list at you like the other template. Maybe we should sort combine them?--CentimeterINCHES 01:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
The one in use now makes use of (standard) dynamic page lists. This one has no potential for that, because the category "pundits" is rather broad, and a dpl wouldn't distinguish the different "kinds."
Also, all of the types listed on this one are really dubious. Blue Talk 02:01, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Maybe so, but I like to differentiate between, say, Frum and Coulter--CentimeterINCHES 02:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
So would I, but generally speaking these "portal" templates don't make those sort of distinctions. Blue Talk 03:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
And this one's "divisions" are really low quality. Fire will ensue shortly. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)