What on Earth were you thinking?

I routinely sign wiki comments with them. Liquid threads is the problem, not my habit. ħuman 01:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

You're so right. Only the other day I found myself stuffing hay into my car's petrol tank because we always used to feed horses to pull carriages. You can imagine my embarrassment!

SR, liquid threads is a disaster. It does not integrate with MW software, it's in beta, so fuck off. Now, is Armondikov going to answer my simple question or are the trolls going to bury this in stupidity? ħuman 01:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Ah - so it's LQT's fault that you can't learn how to use it. I hadn't realised stupidity could be transmitted through wiki software.

I agree with Huw. LT is like emulating a good apple product in windoze. It haz it's place, (and I do not think RW is that place), and werks like the people who do like it to werk. But over all it's clunky and annoying. C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ C®ackeЯ (Just for good measure). (Oh, I also don't like that there is no edit summary...I do some of mine best werk there)

No, Apple products are for people with more money than sense, but RW is the reverse.