So wait...

"Psy was recently involved in a mini HCM about personal shit" I'm sorry, I did not know that. Only so much stuff I can keep in mind at a time. "for doing something that previously passed without comment" TEN MONTHS AGO. That's pretty deep into the archives, and really, it wasn't a story that stuck with me. Once again, I'm really sorry. "because telling somebody off for revealing information that's already public is pretty pointless." Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Maybe it's worth talking about, maybe it's not. It certainly doesn't tell me anything about Psy's overreaction to me asking him, in a pretty polite manner, about the issue.

I agree with everything you said on my talk page--Psy is a more useful, funnier editor than I. Yay. But for you to blame me for his decision to leave without giving any evidence that I crossed the line of acceptable wiki behavior is pretty unfair, as was you calling me a "sanctimonious tosser,"

...a "whining fuck" and ewverything else. I'm sorry Psy is LANCB over a simple dispute. I ain't taking the blame for it.

So I can see. The fact you don't accept it doesn't mean it belongs to you though.

Like I've said several times, if you can produce a difflink that shows me behaving in a manner that is so far betond the community standards as to drive a member away, bring it. If not, you are merely playing the troll. And poorly, at that.

And you're being a stubborn ass. Bugger off and bother someone else. The only troll here is you.

I'm sure you won't be interested in an uninvolved opinion, especially if it differs from your own, but the more you randomly punctuate your comments with "Twat!", "Tosser!", and "Troll!", the more that is what you look like.

You're right. I'm not interested.