User talk:151.160.4.113
Christ on a stick, you're thick[edit]
Did you just fucking go to a youtube video and copy and paste the description(including autoabreviations of urls) to get your "citations"?
Also, I don't think in there's a single red flag redder than citing mises for pseudointellectual hackery. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 19:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- I read each citation, also what is the issue with mises? can you not reed them yourself? — Unsigned, by: 151.160.4.113 / talk / contribs
- I assure you I've read (some) (english translated) Mises, and I assure you he added nothing meaningful, even in his day. Core theses like "Metalism is good because money should always be stable" are the most ludicrously naive, first-principles-only, pragmatic-reality-ignoring economic analyses I can imagine. I don't so much have a problem with him, as merely proposing those kinds of theories isn't ludicrous in and of itself, as I do with anyone in the twenty first century citing him as an authority, as that should set off alarm bells of extremely stupid people who think they're smart. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:19, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- That was one source you know151.160.4.113 (talk) 20:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- I'm still not clicking your youtube video. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:48, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- there were other sources in the description. gosh you are dense151.160.4.113 (talk) 20:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- I'm still not clicking your touyube video. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 21:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- there were other sources in the description. gosh you are dense151.160.4.113 (talk) 20:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- I'm still not clicking your youtube video. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:48, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- That was one source you know151.160.4.113 (talk) 20:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- I assure you I've read (some) (english translated) Mises, and I assure you he added nothing meaningful, even in his day. Core theses like "Metalism is good because money should always be stable" are the most ludicrously naive, first-principles-only, pragmatic-reality-ignoring economic analyses I can imagine. I don't so much have a problem with him, as merely proposing those kinds of theories isn't ludicrous in and of itself, as I do with anyone in the twenty first century citing him as an authority, as that should set off alarm bells of extremely stupid people who think they're smart. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:19, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Did you know...[edit]
...That you have a distinctive editing style? For example, you like hacks like Styx and Rageaholic, and will cite and defend them to the death. You're actually really bad at hiding your opinions and biases. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 20:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- That is subjective151.160.4.113 (talk) 20:46, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- What do you call something that is both subjective and correct 100% of the time? ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- You think you're always right 100% of the time? wow that's silly and irrational151.160.4.113 (talk) 20:53, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Ikanreed I see that the BoN is using the Shapiro Style... ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 21:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- You think you're always right 100% of the time? wow that's silly and irrational151.160.4.113 (talk) 20:53, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- What do you call something that is both subjective and correct 100% of the time? ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
|
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.
We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. |