User talk:209.17.190.78
Your user creation "joke" was lame.-αmεσ (soldier) 13:43, 13 November 2007 (EST)
- No, lame would've been less worse. CЯacke®
- I was just trying to expose the truth, it was never intended as a joke. 209.17.190.78
- Oh...too bad...It worked better as a joke. As "being seriousness" it smacks of intolerance and bigotry. CЯacke®
- I was just trying to expose the truth, it was never intended as a joke. 209.17.190.78
If God hates it, why did he create it? Totnesmartin 13:59, 13 November 2007 (EST)
- He did not. Someone else, probably a pagan god, did. 209.17.190.78
- Why He say "Be fruitful or multiply" then? CЯacke®
- A pagan god? How did it do that? I thought those gods didn't exist. --Edgerunner76 14:44, 13 November 2007 (EST)
- Pagan gods? Oh yes, the ones who don't burn you eternally for being who you are. Totnesmartin 15:06, 13 November 2007 (EST)
Our localization can be described as the special page showing your list of contributions, we are currently there in order to remove the modifications you perform to this website's articles and other pages.[edit]
I think you must have realised we're on your case, and rolling back your lame edits. And there are lots of us and only one of you. Give it up mate. Totnesmartin 15:11, 13 November 2007 (EST)
Razor proxy, eh?[edit]
Why do you bother? Those lists of proxies must be awfully boring to scroll down ... -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
- I bookmark them. And also there is a "Random Proxy" button, so i don't have to go though any stupid list. 67.159.45.93 19:09, 5 December 2007 (EST)
- Meh ... I suppose so. I just don't see the point, really, since we never really block you for appreciable lengths of time. Also, trolling:you fail it. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
Global Warming[edit]
If you have some "issues" with the global warming articles please take them up on the relevant talk pages, otherwise you may find that your edits don't last. Getting a username would also increase your credibility. .-) --Bobbing up 16:24, 9 December 2007 (EST)
Latest block[edit]
Given the Block Log for this IP, I believe my current 3,142 minute block is reasonable.
Take some time to cool down. --Edgerunner76 15:11, 13 December 2007 (EST)
- I did the same, though I dropped it to seconds instead (as I blocked after only one stupid edit). However, I am open to suasion. Researcher 21:39, 26 December 2007 (EST)
Doesn't this get old for you?[edit]
Surely you must have something better to do? PFoster 22:46, 23 December 2007 (EST)
- I am only trying to make edits to the article. That is all. 209.17.190.78 22:48, 23 December 2007 (EST)
- Here's a hint - try talking them out on the talk pages first. PFoster 22:50, 23 December 2007 (EST)
|
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.
We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. |