User talk:

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

I reverted your change[edit]

I reverted your change to conservative correctness because I've seen no compelling evidence or line of reasoning that it's true. Any citation that supports your point would be a good reason to put your change back in. Or you could explain better how you know fat acceptance people are conservative more than people let on, we do allow a bit of original synthesis, if the reasoning is sound enough. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


No really, what? I cannot figure out what's going on with your edit to deepity. What are you trying to communicate? ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 21:18, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

"Deepity" is a listicle of important-sounding phrases that people would prefer to dismiss as being undeserving of the former status. 24 came across a great example of such a phrase (better than some others in the article), but because they like it they use its proposed effect on society to justify its proposed meaningfulness and put it in a new "examples that aren't examples" section. That's my best bet anyhow. (talk) 21:59, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Logical fallacies page[edit]

From what I've seen, you've done some good work there. Nice job. Consider making an account. Koi "the spelling's on porpose!" development 03:31, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Seconded. — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 02:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Information icon.svg This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.