User talk:Ace McWicked/Archive5

You do to the same to conservapedians and some of you are extremely nasty and personal about it

I don't say anything to anyone who doesn't deserve it. You're the pissy little prick who has to get so upset to make such a public exit and remove the discussion[1]. I am not a vandal. All I do is call people names. You do to the same to conservapedians and some of you are extremely nasty and personal about it. You need a dose of this harsh medicine. MarcusCicero 19:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

And as for the community reacting - the community reacted in a way that you disagreed with. That is all. Get over yourself you fucking prima donna. MarcusCicero 19:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Deluded Prick (+Spineless weasal)

You are not the King of RW. Get a hobby which doesn't force you to feed your sense of superiority. YOU WERE THE FUCKER WHO REVERTED SOMEONE ELSES EDIT, NOT ME. This makes you the vandal. Now go fuck off you spineless little weasal. MarcusCicero 20:17, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Fascist

Reversions, page lockings, threats. Go fuck off. You genuinely don't belong here. At least the other members have an open minded way of thinking about how transparant this website should be. And you get away with it... because you lick their arses. You are degenerate scum. MarcusCicero 19:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Clarifications

1. I keep coming back because I get an urge every so often to check out Rationalwiki. Not sure why.
2. You have no point of view other than lame ass new age internet lolism. So take your pov and stick it up your ass.
3. My edits on the crusades or historical revisionism were not controversial and were factual.
4. I complain about you and rationalwiki because it is my natural right. If you are confident your website does not have any of the flaws I believe it does then my criticisms surely have no barbed teeth.
5. I go on that forum roughly once every two weeks. Its not exactly somewhere I log in to every day. Some of the people are quite witty and uncover websites far more obscure and self important than rationalwiki every day.
6. I am not a troll.
7. Having good grammar doesn't make one intellectually superior. Pointing out someone elses grammar is poor is comparable to pointing out that someone used a swear word in a denunciation of Nazi-ism. Its irrelevant and consciouslly derailing. And bitter.
8. I couldn't give a shit about this place if you dropped the intellectual pretensions. The name 'Rationalwiki' is grotesque, unprecedented, bizarre, unbelievable. It makes you look like spoons. Drop the intellectual act or drop the 14 year olds who clog up the website. Either way, you look like immature idiots with nothing better to do with your time. MarcusCicero (talk) 17:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)