User talk:Bicycle Wheel/RationalWikiWiki B

Block

"chaos continues to reign" - really? I just checked the current blocks and it was just a bunch of tits and freds, as usual. Human 03:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

"Chaos" in the sense that there is no instruction about how to integrate RW's arcane blocking sequence into the new vandal bin. Some sysops put the vandal in the bin and block as well. Others do not on the basis that the block is unnecessary. There is no instruction to clarify the procedure.--False Flag 17:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Not many need to be blocked except Tits and Freds etc. Having large numbers of sysops works and deters vandals. ^{— Unsigned, by: 87.113.15.65 / talk / contribs}

Oy oy oy oy oy OY!

I'm a senior sysop and yet I can't edit the page? What kind of gosh darned wiki is this? (I only wanted to add a {{fact}} tag) DeltaStar 01:44, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Unprotected, courtesy of the reverse-cabal. Liveware Problem 01:53, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

It was kinda silly to have it protected for so long at the 'crat-level for spam protection anyways. In my opinion, protecting at the 'crat level should be disabled. Conficker 02:36, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

How bizarre

My office firewall lets me view all of RWW, except this article! It's blocked as it's "Games;Computers/Internet" - I hope they extend the net on this one to block any internet site that's internet related. DeltaStar 16:26, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Lol. Interesting. My favorite internet rating block is "Tasteless content." Conficker 16:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Bob M

I should like to winge about this article on the basis that it is very short.--Bob^{bing up} 11:57, 22 February 2008 (EST)

I agree, but I'm afraid you may need to cause some more drama if you want a longer article, Bob. :-/ --AKjeldsen 12:17, 22 February 2008 (EST)

To be honest, I've decided to relinquish drama and confrontation as it tends to disturb my sleep. Still, I suppose I could toss in a hand grenade at some time in the future to see if I can raise my profile again. It's weird though that the Forum debates we used to have were quite civilized things, whereas the stuff on the Wiki is Red In Tooth And Claw. Still, any ideas AKjeldsen?--Bob^{bing up} 14:29, 22 February 2008 (EST)

You could at least copy in the format on some other user articles where their personal data is stalked and reported? ħuman 16:56, 22 February 2008 (EST)

I blame the software. Wikimedia is great for collaborative writing, but horrible for discussions. But I'm afraid I don't really have any interesting suggestions; I think I've OD'ed on High Drama recently, so my creative spirits need to recharge for a while. --AKjeldsen 18:48, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Actually, my stalk box is slightly wrong. I was a member of RW1. The question mark in front of my name may be removed - my name is indeed, "Bob".--Bob^{bing up} 11:52, 9 March 2008 (EST)

Why isn't the summer he hosted us on BobWiki mentioned?Nutty Roux 15:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

How incredible - the internet includes things I disagree with!

Hi. While I'm always delighted about any recognition I might receive on this august site I'm not sure that the statement attributed to me at the top of the page is the most representative. I was, at the time, paraphrasing something silly which had been said on another site. On the other hand it's nicely ironic so I'm not really complaining.--Bob M 08:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

It seems that Ty has been infected by whatever disease it is that Hans has that makes him take funny quote mines of users. See Dumpling's page for some more extreme examples. Tobul Oltarolin 08:49, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Indeed. Though now I see that the reference at the bottom defines it as "snark", so I guess that I should have kept quiet. Please ignore my comments and return to whatever you were doing. :-)--Bob M 08:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Brianetta

Why does this guy have an article and other people who have done more do not, like Concerned Resident. He needs an article. Or Keegscee. Keegscee needs one. The Apathetic Tool 18:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

So write. RWW has two stages: lots of early stuff from 2007 (all the featured articles date from this time) and a trickle of stuff about whatever whoever turns up cares about. Brianetta probably is a 2007 page that just hung around doing nothing since. 82.153.251.65 11:12, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I didn't realise I was notable! For the record, I am one of those rare users on Rationalwiki who has no history at all with Conservapedia. I'm there for the science. Or something. 188.220.91.30 15:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC) (Brianetta)

I know the feeling. Ty 17:14, 24 April 2011 (UTC)