User talk:Chosenbygrace
|
Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Chosenbygrace.
This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be. |
Why do you believe opponents of creationism are lying? What is your evidence? Totnesmartin 12:17, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Is that grace as in "Will and Grace"? Man, I hate that show. Ace McWickedi9!
- I think "grace" is that mysterious perpetual energy source that fueled 400 years of abuses against children by priests with bulges in their cassocks.
User:Nutty Roux/sigtalk 12:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- I think "grace" is that mysterious perpetual energy source that fueled 400 years of abuses against children by priests with bulges in their cassocks.
<---- what? no links to Nebreska man or Piltdown man lol? What's wrong, to embarassing to talk about? Care to mention the other lies of Darwinists?: ARCHEORAPTOR, Ernst Haeckel? How about the lies of more Darwinist and cover ups by them as documented in Forbidden Archeology you irrational idiot? So stupid and ignorant you Darwinist weasels are.
- Chosenbygrace
That's what er thinks the lies are, Totnes. Let's see... Piltdown was a hoax detected by "Darwinists", Haeckel screwed up some of his embryonic drawings, which he explained as an effort to fill in the gaps between observations, but wishful thinking crept in and he made them a little more like what his Recapitulation Theory would expect than what actually occurs (Ontogeny recapitulates Phylogeny is today accepted in weak form, there being less evolutionary pressure on the embryo and foetus, but not in the strong form Haeckel preferred, which stated that the evolution of an animal was reenacted entirely in the womb). Archaeoraptor was a skeleton put together from fragments of a toothed bird - a legitimate fossil - and a feathered tail and legs - also legitimate, and from the same pit, but not the same animal - by a Chinese peasant hoping to make more money from a more complete fossil (not being a palaeontologist, he believed the configuration to be correct). The mistake was detected, by "Darwinists", prior to full publication, and articles based on pre-publication reports were withdrawn, including one by National Geographic. Nebraska Man was described from a single tooth and blown out of all proportion by an artist. The tooth was later found - by "Darwinists" - to be from an extinct species of peccary. Forbidden Archeology is a book written by a conspiracy theorist using 19th century evidence to show that mankind has existed on earth for billions of years, in line with the tenets of Hindu Creationism. He himself has been linked to hoaxes. WazzaHello? Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me... 23:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Chosenbygrace. (I assume the above is from you even though you didn't sign it.) I'm not quite sure what point I'm meant to pull out of your post. Could you edit it down to a couple of short sentences for clarity? Thanks.--Bobbing up 15:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, Bob. Forgot to sign. It's a late night refutation of Chosen's one edit at the point I wrote it. WazzaHello? Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me... 23:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)