User talk:Conservapedian Parodist
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Conservapedian Parodist.
This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be. |
ТyTalk. 16:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Your edits[edit]
Rely a bit to much on Capslock, and are of questionable value. ТyTalk. 16:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- And the biggest difference between this place and CP is that any idiot registering as RatWikian Parodist at CP would be blocked on site whereas it takes at least four edits from a Conservapedian Parodist for you idiots to figure out what a Conservapedian Parodist is. 17:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- No, your user-page and initial edits showed us right off the bat. I just wanted to see if you would actually be funny(answer:No). Oh, and you are not blocked, you've just had your edit rate reduced.ТyTalk. 17:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Also, we won't squeal like stuck pigs about how conservative vandals are trying to take us down, call the FBI!! And although your start has been less than auspicious, you are still a member of this site, albeit with editing rights that currently match your status. Once you grow up and show us what a find upstanding conservapede you are, you'll get full rights back. You must also remember we didn't use checkuser and give you a creepy 'I know where you live' message. --Ψ GremlinPrata! 17:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- I do think that Poe's law makes conservative parody harder to spot.--False Flag (talk) 17:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Poe's Law says that it is hard to tell fundamentalism apart from parodies of fundamentalism. This was a parody of liberalism, and was about as unfunny as liberals' parodies at CP. I have to give it to you, this site is incredibly funny; I laugh AT you, not with you. I'm a lurker here and find your feeding of trolls to be hilarious, especially MC and the cheerleader! And who do you think you're kidding, no trolls are funny, they're annoying and best ignored, but people like you are funny making a laughing stock out of yourselves and going into "HCMs" Anyway, smile, you're on Uncyclopedia! — Unsigned, by: Conservapedian Parodist / talk / contribs
- It's good to hear that you're enjoying your time here. We aim to please.--BobSpring is sprung! 20:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- This site is growing rapidly!!! Lord Goonie Hooray! I'm helping! 23:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- It's good to hear that you're enjoying your time here. We aim to please.--BobSpring is sprung! 20:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Poe's Law says that it is hard to tell fundamentalism apart from parodies of fundamentalism. This was a parody of liberalism, and was about as unfunny as liberals' parodies at CP. I have to give it to you, this site is incredibly funny; I laugh AT you, not with you. I'm a lurker here and find your feeding of trolls to be hilarious, especially MC and the cheerleader! And who do you think you're kidding, no trolls are funny, they're annoying and best ignored, but people like you are funny making a laughing stock out of yourselves and going into "HCMs" Anyway, smile, you're on Uncyclopedia! — Unsigned, by: Conservapedian Parodist / talk / contribs
- I do think that Poe's law makes conservative parody harder to spot.--False Flag (talk) 17:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Also, we won't squeal like stuck pigs about how conservative vandals are trying to take us down, call the FBI!! And although your start has been less than auspicious, you are still a member of this site, albeit with editing rights that currently match your status. Once you grow up and show us what a find upstanding conservapede you are, you'll get full rights back. You must also remember we didn't use checkuser and give you a creepy 'I know where you live' message. --Ψ GremlinPrata! 17:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- No, your user-page and initial edits showed us right off the bat. I just wanted to see if you would actually be funny(answer:No). Oh, and you are not blocked, you've just had your edit rate reduced.ТyTalk. 17:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)