User talk:Derenek
Vortex science[edit]
Don't spam links to your pseudoscience garbage that's getting nuked from Wikipedia.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Dude, just stop it. RationalWiki exists to call out the bullshit pseudoscience you wrote about at wikipedia:Vortex Science.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:55, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- I came here so people could actually discuss the merits and or flaws in he theory. Which supposedly is the point of the site. So if you find it flawed, give your reasons ad discuss. Being an ass is just not nice.Derenek (talk)
Stop posting about vortex science on RationalWiki. This is not the place for it.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 08:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
You've got an interesting CV by the way.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 08:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Please do not leave me messages at the top of my user talk page. Use the "add section" button or respond to me here. Also, I don't take kindly to people abusing wikis to spread their made up garbage and fake diploma mill credentials.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 08:18, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
It is possible you have greatly misunderstood RationalWiki:What is a RationalWiki article? - David Gerard (talk) 09:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
If you're looking for people that will take your proposal seriously and maybe help you figure out some of the flaws of your proposed 'theory', I'm sure there's plenty of forums and chatrooms around the internet willing to do so. Not that most of those people will have scientific credentials. As to RationalWiki, it exists to debunk rubbish ideas that some people actually believe in. Unless your Vortex Science ToE gains some kind of acceptance in (probably very) limited circles, RationalWiki doesn't need to bother with your theory. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 09:19, 13 June 2015 (UTC)