User talk:Fall down
|
This is a talkpage for communicating with the user about their contributions to RationalWiki, it is not to be used for troll baiting and trolling. Don't feed the Troll |
Pointless trolling follows.[edit]
Aw[edit]
And it was such a nice, clean, untouched talk page... Now it has cooties! ħuman
02:09, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
yawn[edit]
you still here? Mei 22:40, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
XD[edit]
[1] -- sounds more like something written by Fa11 down! Stop you're killing me! XD Mei 12:44, 10 March 2009 (EDT)
absolute zero[edit]
You made an edit that wasn't retarded. This must be an omen of terrible events to come. MeiRobot1 23:55, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
- He's done it again. HELP!!! If he keeps this up, we'll have to de-vandal him. --<choose>
<option>Input The ResistorOutput</option> <option>CoyoteOver 450 pages watched NOT including talk pages</option> <option>The Trickster</option> <option>Acionyx</option> 17:15, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
What's so funny about anal rape?[edit]
It seems to be a recurring motif with you. What's that all about? TheoryOfPractice 18:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Why?[edit]
You keep going on about censorship, yet we had a clean slate after the server upgrade and you use you account for vandalising. You could have contributed but you chose not to. My question is why did you go on about getting un-vandal binned so much only to get yourself stuck back in there? - π 06:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Oi[edit]
Stop saying things and vanishing. What would happen if someone actually wanted to talk to you? User:Mei
- They would expose him as a hypocritical lying troll? - π 03:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Mei thinks Fall down is funny. Look at him capering! That emperor guy who was Kefka's boss
wwhoa[edit]
I paroled you. Be sort of nice for a bit, right? User:Mei
- I have put you back. I think we might need a reverse Admin abuse case for Fall down to be paroled. - π 03:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Why? He's completely harmless. User:Mei
- He is harmless because he is in the bin, like the lions at the zoo. - π 03:40, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- If there was actually anything destructive he could do, he could just get a new account and do it. Do you disagree? User:Mei
- He does that any way. He used this account to cause lots of trouble including harassing several of our users until they were forced to leave/take a break. If we let him have this account back, without first consulting everyone, it would appear as a commendation of his actions. He is a troll and shall be treated as such. - π 03:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- You want to keep the vandal status as a formality, even though you know it has no real effect? User:Mei
- It does autolimit his IP address (not just the account) to two edit an hour and no page moves. This forces him to use proxies, which have dialup speeds, and the vandal also limits them to the same rate of editing, forcing him to have to get new proxies. Basically deleting and revert his crap is easy than him producing it. The hope is that it is such an inconvenience for him and such an easy task for us, that he will realise that this is a futile waste of his time and give up. - π 03:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- But he hasn't done anything recently. I thought it was policy to parole people for editing peacefully. That's what the bin is for right? Could we give him a trial run? I'll be your friend ;_____; User:Mei
- It depends on who else agrees, we could have a parole case for Fall down. - π 04:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Don't just do it - bring it before the mob. And I suspect we will never parole this "creature". ħuman 04:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- EC Do we have to make a song and dance of it? I thought we were an anti boring debate wiki. We could just parole him and then zap him if he does anything. Much simpler. Also a parole case would only give him a venue for his Jean Valjean act. Which is pretty dire. User:Mei
- Do we have to go through this idiocy again? He was binned for good reasons, including sustained harrassment. I'm sorry, but I will not support any attempt to have him unbinned, and I have no idea why people like you and CUR seem so eager to have him running around smearing his feces on the walls again. --Kels 04:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, don't support it. But blocks etc only feed his ego imho. If you didn't exaggerate his accomplishments he'd just wander off someplace else. User:Mei
- He's vandal binned, so he shouldn't be getting much in the line of blocks. --Kels 04:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- You know what I mean :-p Kels is awkward
- If we didn't block or bin him he would do it all day until this place looked like a mess of shit, like Encyclopaedia Dramatica. - π 04:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Strawman! Disqualified! Mei is Mei
- Not really, he just moves pages to stupid titles and the ones he doesn't he fills full of hateful bile; just like EC. - π 04:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- EC Chill, I never said "don't block him at all", I said "let him out if he's been good for a while". Moot point though, because he hasn't anymore. Same time next week? User:Mei
- The VB atually works for FD. He can edit a bit, not being blocked, in order to vent his spleen. De-binning lets him wreak havoc, as PI points out. And he does it when he can - like after the upgrade, when the VB was emptied. ħuman 04:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not really, he just moves pages to stupid titles and the ones he doesn't he fills full of hateful bile; just like EC. - π 04:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Strawman! Disqualified! Mei is Mei
- If we didn't block or bin him he would do it all day until this place looked like a mess of shit, like Encyclopaedia Dramatica. - π 04:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- You know what I mean :-p Kels is awkward
- He's vandal binned, so he shouldn't be getting much in the line of blocks. --Kels 04:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, don't support it. But blocks etc only feed his ego imho. If you didn't exaggerate his accomplishments he'd just wander off someplace else. User:Mei
- Do we have to go through this idiocy again? He was binned for good reasons, including sustained harrassment. I'm sorry, but I will not support any attempt to have him unbinned, and I have no idea why people like you and CUR seem so eager to have him running around smearing his feces on the walls again. --Kels 04:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Don't just do it - bring it before the mob. And I suspect we will never parole this "creature". ħuman
- It depends on who else agrees, we could have a parole case for Fall down. - π 04:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- But he hasn't done anything recently. I thought it was policy to parole people for editing peacefully. That's what the bin is for right? Could we give him a trial run? I'll be your friend ;_____; User:Mei
- It does autolimit his IP address (not just the account) to two edit an hour and no page moves. This forces him to use proxies, which have dialup speeds, and the vandal also limits them to the same rate of editing, forcing him to have to get new proxies. Basically deleting and revert his crap is easy than him producing it. The hope is that it is such an inconvenience for him and such an easy task for us, that he will realise that this is a futile waste of his time and give up. - π 03:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- You want to keep the vandal status as a formality, even though you know it has no real effect? User:Mei
- He does that any way. He used this account to cause lots of trouble including harassing several of our users until they were forced to leave/take a break. If we let him have this account back, without first consulting everyone, it would appear as a commendation of his actions. He is a troll and shall be treated as such. - π 03:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- If there was actually anything destructive he could do, he could just get a new account and do it. Do you disagree? User:Mei
- He is harmless because he is in the bin, like the lions at the zoo. - π 03:40, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Why? He's completely harmless. User:Mei
All this talk about him has brought him back. He, his socks and his IPs are all being vandal binned. - π 04:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Didn't we go through this same stupid conversation just a little while ago, when CUR was gonna cut a deal to have him brought up for parole without consulting anyone? I recall the general consensus being along the lines of "no fucking way", so why are we going through the same again, but with Mei playing the part of CUR? --Kels 04:44, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
I don't need to be paroled, just make me a sysop at RWW Fall down
- None of our business, take it up with a bureaucrat there. - π 04:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- wtf for? User:Mei
- Different site. How 'bout you lot discuss it over there? --Kels 04:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Redirects[edit]
Circular redirecting doesn't do anything. It will probably get deleted as a double redirect next time I run the bot though. - π 02:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
w[edit]
|
Please see this political leaflet and this badge of support, which you should adopt as soon as possible. Vote for Mei. |
We have no more confetti. -- =w= 20:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
w[edit]
I don't think that even works. Plus I like how you didn't delete the rest of the log. You obviously liked reading it too much. -- =w= 18:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Long time...[edit]
Perhaps you'll consider turning over a new leaf? Blue (pester) 05:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Hmm[edit]
No edits for five years? Welcome back. — Dysk (contribs) 09:22, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
You're nominated![edit]
You've been nominated to the RationalMedia Foundation election. Please accept or decline here; if you accept, you may wish to campaign.
71.3.195.138 (talk) 11:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Epic. — Dysk (contribs) 11:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)