User talk:Fall down 2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Fall down 2.
This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be. |
You may not have understood the purpose of function of this wiki. Please consider the link above. Cheers.--Bobbing up 04:40, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- You have been blocked for two days and put in the vandal bin. In view of the fact that your username is a clear copy of that of another user it may be changed to something else. Opinions?--Bobbing up 05:17, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- I have been saving something special for Fall down. - User 05:20, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- For those who don't know, this user was rather confusingly named: User:WeaseIoid. While I understand the sentiment behind the rename, I'm not sure that this particular name shows much more maturity than that our our vandal. It also does rather highlight both him and his favourite complaint - which I would imagine is not our objective. I personally think that we should follow the very neutral pattern kindly set down by the Freds: Fall down1, Fall down2 and so on. (Or perhaps vandal sock 1, vandal sock 2) This would have the advantage of making them instantly recognisable and would give less emotional satisfaction to our vandal. Remember that these people get off on recognition. This rename gives recognition in spades.--Bobbing up 06:05, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- These tricks done on Fall Down are getting increasingly puerile, particularly that redirect of yours, π. If Fall Down was blocked for such things, what gives you the right to do them? Phantom Hoover 06:26, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- Nothing. I have just found that if I make him angry enough he goes away. The problem is he will keep going indefinitely, he has created over 30 accounts now. Whereas when I renamed him Women are my superior and I respect them as such and Andrew Usher is Alison Cassidy's Bitch it hurts his pride and he slinks off back where he came from. How many sock blocks have slowed him down? None would be my guess. - User 08:23, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- I agree. As an occasional user, it's hard enough spotting what is going on without all the confusing name changes. I say rename the socks to Fall Down #.
- Fred is useful at least in that he names himself in an obvious way. What doesn't help is when one of our own then goes and renames them to something else.
- Any way, Merry Christmas / Happy Holidays (delete depending on how PC we are) and let's not fight over a wandal! Bondurant 06:56, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- These tricks done on Fall Down are getting increasingly puerile, particularly that redirect of yours, π. If Fall Down was blocked for such things, what gives you the right to do them? Phantom Hoover 06:26, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- For those who don't know, this user was rather confusingly named: User:WeaseIoid. While I understand the sentiment behind the rename, I'm not sure that this particular name shows much more maturity than that our our vandal. It also does rather highlight both him and his favourite complaint - which I would imagine is not our objective. I personally think that we should follow the very neutral pattern kindly set down by the Freds: Fall down1, Fall down2 and so on. (Or perhaps vandal sock 1, vandal sock 2) This would have the advantage of making them instantly recognisable and would give less emotional satisfaction to our vandal. Remember that these people get off on recognition. This rename gives recognition in spades.--Bobbing up 06:05, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- I have been saving something special for Fall down. - User 05:20, 24 December 2008 (EST)
