RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3220Goal: $6000

User talk:Feredir28/Kent Hovind's Creation Seminar: Lies in the Textbooks

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Interpreting Evidence and Scoffers[edit]

One of the refutations:

3. Incorrect, in 1979 the minimum age of the earth was determined to be 75,000 years old.

1979? Should that be 1779? — Unsigned, by: Gomer / talk / contribs

Dunno. but seems reasonable to me: make it so Gomer. Pippa (talk) 21:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
OK, on the gounds that it seems better than what is already there...Gomer (talk) 21:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
yes, 1779. Sorry mates, I cant believe I screwed up that one. Feredir28 (talk) 22:17, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

sub space - no, not *that* kind[edit]

Question, do we have/want to put things like "all the books every written that someone wants to review" under a subspace for those? "Kent hovnid/book one" and "kent hovind/book 2", or is that not really wanted/practical on a wiki? I keep seeing all these books and articles around here by this Hovnid and wonder if they can/should be grouped.Pink mowse.pngEn attendant Godot 21:25, 30 August 2011 (UTC)