User talk:HeidelbergKid/Blastocysts on stem cell research

wtf? Sophie^{because liberals} 16:34, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

i second that --il'Dictator Mikal 16:37, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

The point of this is to show that the blastocyst doesn't give a damn if it's used for stem cell research or not, in a snarky way. The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 16:42, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

this was snarky? also, have you interviewed a Blastocyst to find out? --il'Dictator Mikal 16:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Coming up, Dinosaurs discuss evolution, trees discuss global warming and glasses of water discuss homeopathy. What the hell is this drivel? Delete, or better, move to HK's userspace for us to embarrass him with when he grows up. Sophie^{because liberals} 16:48, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

It is. Blastocysts have no neurons with which to think, they're just a hollow ball of cells. The point is, the blastocyst is not physically able to have an opinion as it lacks the physical components of the brain necessary to make decisions, so it doesn't care: hence the point of this article. Although you did give me an inspiration for a YT video. The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 16:52, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

uh huh... still not snarky--il'Dictator Mikal 16:53, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Snark is in the eye of the beholder. The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

and this is a wiki, not a blog, so what a creator thinks doesnt really matter once he publishes it. I am going to make one serious recommendation to you though HBK, before making articles, put them in userspace and work on them there. And actually work on them too. That way the threat of deletion isnt overhanging at all times and you dont have to worry about us wanting it changed til it goes to ms--il'Dictator Mikal 17:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Fully unnecessary article, and it makes a good thing "the use of the tumbleweeds on one article", an over done, tiresome joke. GodotGrow a vagina 17:48, 19 February 2012 (UTC)