RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2020.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $1800Goal: $3000

User talk:Human/sandbox

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: I blank this sandbox whenever I feel like it. Please use my talk page to communicate unless you are working on something with me here.

(moved odd discussion of goons, sellers, etc. to Talk:Audiophile

Best of luck  ;-p Susanpurrrrr ... 16:50, 11 December 2007 (EST)

Hah! This version came via a circuitous route - assfly whined that people were banned from WP for saying they were xtian - so I followed the link to some user page. I guess I was looking at diffs, and someone added a collapsing box around an inclusion of a subpage. But it obviously depends on a few things we don't have. Recursion time! humanUser talk:Human 17:26, 11 December 2007 (EST)

homeschool sandbox issues[edit]

Human, do you even know what "rational" means? SHahB 21:12, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

Bohdan, do you even know what "user space" means? humanUser talk:Human 21:19, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
The rule is for userpages, right? If not, then I apologize. SHahB 21:19, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
Sub pages are generally respected as being part of the user page. Your apology is accepted, no harm done. Anyway, I'm not sure if this one is worth doing, so I want to see what I can make of it before foisting it on others to improve. What was I typing (besides everything I ever type) that makes you think I don't know what "rational" means? humanUser talk:Human 21:23, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
You didn't remove my remark about tmt (#17 though its probably true). I recommend leaving it in until he denies it. SHahB 21:24, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

by saying "rational response" you are implying their position is irrational. I hope you realize that you can disagree with someone without them being irrational. SHahB 21:27, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

Ah, I see. It's just a placeholder for when we do these things in the public space, so people can tell where to edit. You should see what it says (the template) where the points being refuted or mocked go... humanUser talk:Human 21:39, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

Open for discussion[edit]

As I said on the main talk page, I am trying to figure out what to do with this. Just because I "made it", I don't think it necessarily deserves publication on RW. But perhaps it does. Locations (ie, namespace) and titles would be welcome. Also, for the time being, I will open it up to editing by the mob. Thank you for your participation. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:20, 16 June 2008 (EDT)

In the words of Graham Chapman of Monty Python, "This has become very silly." Would you argue too terribly if I stole your coding and posted a more down to earth critique in the same style? SirChuckBThat is all 03:32, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
If I copied it to a main space, you could edit it anyway you want... care to suggest a title? ħumanUser talk:Human 03:45, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
Actually I was thinking of working on it in a sandbox and then presenting it for approval. SirChuckBThat is all 03:53, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
Whatever you want to do is fine, of course. And copying this to your own sandbox wouldn't be "stealing", this wiki uses the GFDL. Feel free to use whatever you want of it. ħumanUser talk:Human 14:46, 16 June 2008 (EDT)