There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Mei II/Cunning Log of Mei/160410
I like this one. The part about Wikipedia is very interesting, and I do agree that people want to change the project's direction but aren't willing to start another one (with a few exceptions, like Larry Sanger and Andy Schlafly). However, I think that there is a good reason for this: people recognize that WP is already an enormous stockpile of information, and they think (correctly) that it would much easier to convince people to change their tune a little instead of starting a whole new wiki from scratch. Tetronian you're clueless 11:48, 17 April 2010 (UTC)