User talk:Mr. Bojangles/Rewrite of George Washington

Good. But needs paragraphs. Sorry if that's butting in before you were going to do it, though, Pegasus (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Working on it. I believe this to be slightly better than the other I involuntarily volunteered to clean up, eh? And I was going to find a legal image too.--Mr. Bojangles (talk) 01:02, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, too much not enough strikeout humour in that one. Pegasus (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Meh, that one was kinda pointless anyway. The first President at least deserves a serious mini-bio.--Mr. Bojangles (talk) 01:11, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

As a bio, yeah. But there's this whole "Cult of Washington" thing going around that also needs included. You know when people are "Washington was this" "Washington was that" "Washington would be appalled if he saw abortions/atheism/cars/taxes/hydroelectric power" that sort of thing. 01:24, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

I haven't heard of it, actually. I will do a bit of research on it then. I assume it is of the extreme right wing then.--Mr. Bojangles (talk) 02:03, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

I have to say that currently this draft is very dry and too much like an encyclopedia entry. Totnesmartin (talk) 13:35, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Well so are most of the President entries with the exceptions of Dubya and Obama. So, what does this need? If you can improve, feel free! I just wrote a mini-bio.--Mr. Bojangles (talk) 16:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)