User talk:PacWalker/Userpage

Nice template modification

Nice "disclaimer" template PacWalker.

Unless someone screams bloody murder, I think that's the kind of polite warning label that I had in mind - perhaps supplemented by a new category (did I mention I like categories? I don't, I really, really, really adore categories! - nah, just kidding). ScepticWombat (talk) 09:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Any thoughts on the wording? Also, I feel like the blue i and the brain watermark are a bad pair aesthetically; should I maybe ditch the watermark/use another messagebox class, or use some other icon, or am I just being weird? As for the category, umm, what were you thinking for a name? And hidden, or no? PacWalker 09:38, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

I was toying with possibly a combination of two categories for the two examples I mentioned on the CC talk page: Not endorsed by RationalWiki and Zombie editor (Myopic editor? Myopic ZomBot? Woo ZomBot? Something like that anyway).

The first highlights that their article'ish looks are not to be taken at face value, while the second highlights that these RWers don't contribute anything beyond their own pages - not even essays, debates or comments (by contrast, LogicMaster does at least engage with other editors, no matter how obnoxious (s)he may be).

As for aesthetics, you're asking the wrong guy. I'm not very "designer-minded" :-) ScepticWombat (talk) 10:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

I guess the second of those would ideally be switched... hmm. All right. And I'm kinda going back and forth on whether or not to de-brain the background, so I'll leave that be unless someone comes along and gives aesthetic judgments. PacWalker 10:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

The brain seems fine. FuzzyDogPotato (talk/stalk) 15:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)