User talk:SusanG/Open comment to teratornis

His motives do seem a bit dodgy, and he seems more than capable of skulduggery. Locke ^{Always Watching......} 00:43, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

Ah; but we know where he lives (joke!). If he tries anything he's more to lose @ wiki, meta etc - they don't suffer wandals and such. With a bit of luck he'll just piss off. Susan^{talk to me} 00:55, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

If only we could be so lucky. Locke ^{Always Watching......} 00:57, 19 October 2007 (EDT) P.S. Sod not piss.

Well done Susan, although I approach the matter from a different direction. What is the use of someone who fills up the recent changes page with inumerable edits to his user page and is yet to make, AFAICT, one contribution to the actual site itself. I rather suspect he is a glory hound, along the lines of: "See my user pages, only someone important to the wiki could have a user page like that. My name is Ozymandias Teratornis, king of wikis, look on my works, you mighty, and despair." So if he wants to be Ozymandias, lets consign him and his nonworks to the same fate.--Remarcsd 00:59, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

I don't think he's got any agenda except his own ego inflation. ;-p Susan^{talk to me} 01:02, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

Shall we set up a request for comment as occurred with HoG? Locke ^{Always Watching......} 01:08, 19 October 2007 (EDT) Afterthought- Or should we cut the bleeding little git a break.

Wait a couple of days for the mob to see everything & then reconvene? Susan^{talk to me} 01:12, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

Sounds good. This shan't take more than a fortnight, shall it? Locke ^{Always Watching......} 01:14, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

Shall we say Monday? - get the week off to an interesting start. Susan^{talk to me} 01:24, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

Sounds like a decent amount of time. Until then we wait to see how things play out. Locke ^{Always Watching......} 01:25, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

My argument for the defense can be found on Human's talk page.--Bob^{bing for apples} 04:25, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

I have to agree with Bob, here. Have you seen what's in the fun space? And you're going to complain about this guy? I'd assume good faith. He's not even edited in the mainspace. So he's a beaurocratic wonk? It's that any worse than people moving article from category to category as seems to be the vogue here right now? I'm just not bothered by this.VirileSterile^yawn! 07:27, 19 October 2007 (EDT)