2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Category talk:Best of people

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Use it or lose it? (My vote is for lose it.) ThunderkatzHo! 17:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Seems to be similar to that Ed-Poor only category. Lose it. ТyTalk. 01:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
It's a good idea for a category and relatively easy to implement. Keep. Blue (is useful) 01:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
What criteria do you have in mind? Gold/Silver articles on people would be an idea. ТyTalk. 01:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, that seems about right. Blue (pester) 19:58, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Judging from Template:rated, that would be redundant. Probably best to delete it. ArchieGoodwin (talk) 13:38, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

BUMP. ThunderkatzHo! 08:24, 18 December 2011 (UTC)