Category talk:Bisexuals
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Is this category really necessary?--ZooGuard (talk) 17:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- I think this and Category:Homosexuals should
dienot exist. αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 23:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)- Since these categories refer to discriminated groups of people, I don't think "should die" is a preferable way to phrase that. >.> 141.134.75.236 (talk) 23:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- ... Because there's no way to extricate an electronic category on a wiki from a physical group of people. <.< αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 00:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hey, I'm not saying I don't know you're talking about the categories, but taken out of context your statement could be seen as notably offensive. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 08:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep it. Even if it's only as a user category, keep it. As a bisexual, I like knowing who else feels (and, more importantly, understnads) the way I am. Noisemobile (talk) 12:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Would it be fine to empty this (and category:homosexuals) of non-users, then? αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 12:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- If it's gonna exist as a category, I don't see the harm in having it on articles where the person being bisexual is of relevant notice, like Oscar Wilde for example. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 13:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oscar certainly fits here. Still don't like the category, but I'll let my endless rage subside for awhile. αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 22:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- If it's gonna exist as a category, I don't see the harm in having it on articles where the person being bisexual is of relevant notice, like Oscar Wilde for example. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 13:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Would it be fine to empty this (and category:homosexuals) of non-users, then? αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 12:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep it. Even if it's only as a user category, keep it. As a bisexual, I like knowing who else feels (and, more importantly, understnads) the way I am. Noisemobile (talk) 12:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hey, I'm not saying I don't know you're talking about the categories, but taken out of context your statement could be seen as notably offensive. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 08:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- ... Because there's no way to extricate an electronic category on a wiki from a physical group of people. <.< αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 00:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Since these categories refer to discriminated groups of people, I don't think "should die" is a preferable way to phrase that. >.> 141.134.75.236 (talk) 23:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)