There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Category talk:Christianity
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The ability to be sarcastic is not the definition of "rational", nor is it scientific. I would not donate a penny to you idiots. — Unsigned, by: Elharris / talk / contribs
- I didn't know sarcasm, science and rationalism were mutually exclusive, nor that RationalWiki claims sarcasm IS rationalism and science...-- Forerunner (talk) 12:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- The ability to be miserly and critical is not the definition of "Christianity", nor is it kind to people, even in the face of your critics. I would not consider you either. Trick (talk) 12:29, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Interesting place to put this point as well, as the category page is one of the least sarcastic RW pages on Christianity. Worm (talk) 14:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sarcasm? I've never seen any sarcasm here. In fact, I'm pretty sure it's impossible to be sarcastic on rationalwiki. Also, you don't have to donate if don't want to; that's why it's called donating. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 14:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Interesting place to put this point as well, as the category page is one of the least sarcastic RW pages on Christianity. Worm (talk) 14:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)