Category talk:Conservapedia sysops

Do these need to be in the main cat as well? - User $\scriptstyle h/2\hbar$ 01:17, 28 October 2008 (EDT)

Not really. I think we reached a consensus about this before. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:28, 28 October 2008 (EDT)

Not all of these are sysops. Also, do they really need to be sub-pages of the Conservapedia:Sysops page? Can't we just move them out as separate entries in the CP namespace? weaseLOId~ 19:07, 15 December 2008 (EST)

The sysop sub articles were never really written as a proper articles, they were just kind of a dumping ground for random things with the only thing they have in common is they were related to that particular sysop. They were largely ignored until about a month ago. I don't feel that we need to have a little biography sketch about each person who has block rights on CP, because lets be honest by and large they are dull people with little achievements. As sub-pages it makes them seem less important as having a bio page like Andy. - User $\scriptstyle h/2\hbar$ 19:13, 15 December 2008 (EST)