There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Category talk:Conservapedia sysops
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Do these need to be in the main cat as well? - User 01:17, 28 October 2008 (EDT)
- Not really. I think we reached a consensus about this before.
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:28, 28 October 2008 (EDT)
Not all of these are sysops. Also, do they really need to be sub-pages of the Conservapedia:Sysops page? Can't we just move them out as separate entries in the CP namespace? weaseLOId~ 19:07, 15 December 2008 (EST)
- The sysop sub articles were never really written as a proper articles, they were just kind of a dumping ground for random things with the only thing they have in common is they were related to that particular sysop. They were largely ignored until about a month ago. I don't feel that we need to have a little biography sketch about each person who has block rights on CP, because lets be honest by and large they are dull people with little achievements. As sub-pages it makes them seem less important as having a bio page like Andy. - User 19:13, 15 December 2008 (EST)