There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Category talk:Copper-level articles
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
So is this basically just "not a stub but still too shit even for bronze"? Seems a bit pointless. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Copper swords are pretty lousy that way. Tytalk 18:48, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Nope. Take a look at the descriptions. Bronze needs a significant number of sources, correct styling, good length and no outstanding issues. Copper needs at least a couple sources and categories and have at least a subsection. Bronze articles aren't meant to be shit. Neither are copper. Blue (is useful) 18:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)