Category talk:Vandals

What's the point of this? ħuman 01:16, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

What's the point of you asking this? It's harmless. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 03:01, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

Of course. But that is not an answer to my question. ħuman 03:16, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

It doesn't have a point, and it doesn't need one. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 03:31, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

First point taken, and seen already. Second one, sounds like "stupid" to me. "Doesn't need one"? IE, no reason is good enough? All I see is a museum of famous idiots, for no good reason. Since this cat is generated mostly by some template, it ought to be easy to empty it. ħuman 03:43, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

I have to agree with human. Like trolls all a vandal wants is attention. Keeping a list of the will only encourage them. If a sysop wants to find vandals they only need to check who is in the vandal bin (something that should be added to the list of special pages so it can be found easier). - User $\approx$$\pi$_{For best results also use RationalWiki moisturizing conditioner} 04:13, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

Killing this silly cat once more. Pi guy nailed what bugs me about it - it is useless to us, but creates a "gallery of rogues". ħuman 01:45, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

Since when did two users count as "consensus" to delete? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 15:20, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

Actually putting the vandal cat somewhere easy to find would be a nice move. Any chance in the navigation box or the toolbox?--Bob^{bing up} 15:42, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

Are/were people actually using it for some purpose? Would they? And, again, what's the point of a cat full of Freds and My passwords? ħuman 17:02, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

This category is not needed everyone who is listed as a vandal can be found here. If you want to know if a user is a vandal search for his name. - User $\approx$$\pi$_{For best results also use RationalWiki moisturizing conditioner} 17:05, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

Incorrect. The "vandal" usergroup contains less than a third of our actual vandals. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 21:13, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

And who cares if we have a list of anyone/everyone who ever signed up and blanked a page? ħuman 00:27, 21 October 2008 (EDT)

Well if they have not returned since the vandal bin was installed do we need to keep an eye on them? - User $\approx$$\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {(-1)^{n}4}{2n+1}}$_{Now with more maths and less slogans} 01:07, 21 October 2008 (EDT)

Why do we need this back again?

? Weaseloid^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 15:51, 11 February 2009 (EST)

I didn't notice the above conversation. Time educated Phantom Hoover! 15:56, 11 February 2009 (EST)

So can we delete it again? Weaseloid^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 15:58, 11 February 2009 (EST)

Yes. ħuman 16:26, 11 February 2009 (EST)