Conservapedia:What is going on at CP?/April 2018

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wigocp.svg This Conservapedia-related article is of largely historical interest and is no longer the focus of RationalWiki today.
Conservapedia (and religious fundamentalism to an extent) was a major focal point in the early history of RationalWiki, but long ago ceased coming up with new ways to appall and amuse.
Our energies are now spent debunking other, fresher examples of pseudoscientific claims, authoritarianism, and deceit.
For RationalWiki's less ancient content, try the Best of RationalWiki.
← Previous archive Next archive →


April 2018[edit]

96

Andeepak: The wave-particle duality is the same as God being a "wave" as the Holy Spirit, and also being matter in the form of Jesus. A open-minded appreciation of the wave-particle duality of the Trinity could have opened the eyes of scientists nearly 2000 years sooner to the fundamental wave-particle duality of nature discovered in the 1900s.img
Even today a more open-minded recognition of the truth of the Trinity would help scientists understand the reality of wave-duality.img (FSTDT link)

74

Will the Toronto nutjob make Young Mass Murderersimg? Misogyny isn't a recognized "belief"; e.g., incel hero Elliot Rodgerimg was actually a video game victim. Similarly, Alek Minassianimg was primarily driven by dark clothing. There's still time to discover he was a Muslim or an atheist or an honorary Canadian Democrat.

74

Conservapedian mathematics: Negative implication is an underdeveloped concept of logic that the existence of +1, for example, implies the existence of -1.img
[...]
Negative implication is required by the fundamental uncertainty discovered in quantum mechanics and described in the Book of Genesis, because uncertainty about "A" requires the existence of "Not A." (FSTDT link)
Mystery: "Mathematicians did not widely accept the validity of negative numbers until the 1800s", but did a certain trustworthy encyclopedia accept the validity of complex and imaginary numbers as recently as 2007?

94

1990'sguy blocks new user 1880'sguy for not using their real name.img