Conservapedia:What is going on at CP?/November 2007

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Previous archive Next archive →


  • Blocked for LIEberal censorship.
  • Given CBC's last article on Conservapedia, I'm sure their latest documentation will be glowing.
  • Utterly clueless!
  • Wait, what? I can't keep track of who really is a young earth creationist, and who's simply taking the piss these days...
  • Back to the moon. Andy takes on the Pope and his endorsement of evolution. Those who quote widely available, and therefore verifiable, sources on the internet are accused of hearsay. Quoting private dinner conversations isn't? He tells us that the theory of evolution and an Old Earth erodes one's faith, implying the Pope is a faith eroder and servant of atheism.
  • This just in: creationists invented science. Who knew?
  • OMG FUTURAMA reference!
  • Ed Poor has officially won the Rational Wiki Award for Outstanding Contributions to the Field of Uninformed Rambling for this post. However, regular readers should note with shock that he takes a stand against creation science! Well... it seems everyone's turning on 'ol Andy these days.
  • Interesting that Assfly would create this article on the day that they pulled the plug on TK.
  • Oh noes! Teh gays are taking over Fox News!!!ELEVENTY111!!!
  • And it's official. TK has left the building.
  • HooRAY! The /16 range blocks are back! And another...
  • Ed Poor raises the bar for concise articles. Not only is the article useless, but unless you pay, the link is useless too.
  • Global warming, also known as Al Gore's theory...
  • Shocker, CP and WND misrepresent a school spirit day as an attack on Christian Values.
  • Andy's campaign to save mathematics from itself marches on. VERY poorly describing category theory, then dismissing it as "abstract nonsense". Note the complete lack of reference in his "added reference" diff. (See [[Conservapedia:Conservapedian mathematics*Finally, Homosexuality has become the most viewed page. Conservative's relentless efforts to deliver quality content payed off. Andy is so modest; he'd rather not have people discuss it, because it would be un-encyclopedic.
  • Recommendation to Wikipedia: you'd attract more donors if you weren't so anti-Christian and anti-American - a beautifully poetic code-phrase by Andy. Translated from [[Fun:Asshole*TK? Who? Never heard of him. Update: Someone tries to fish it back out of the memory hole. Update: SSchultz tries sucking up to Ken (not a homosexual reference). And it goes on...
  • Conservapedia has no article on the concept of free speech - merely the Free Speech Clause of the U.S. Constitution. It also only appears to apply to citizens. This article is complete with a lovely "dickish" graphic.
  • Screw health care, median income, education, and all of that other liberal crap. Per capita income is apparently the only good way to measure a country's living standards.
  • LMFAO. If thisn't some sort of poetic justice, then I don't know what is.
  • A bunch of blogs laugh themselves silly when they find out that Conservapedia's most viewed articles are all super-homophobic drivel. A sampling can be seen here. The resultant mocking traffic has Andy jumping for joy! Whoop-dee-fucking-doo.
  • Conservapedia once again delights in the flaws of Wikipedia (this time run-of-the-mill vandalism), apparently under the delusion that what's bad for Wikipedia is good for Conservapedia. What they fail to grasp is that when it comes to vandalism and reliability, what's bad for WP is worse for CP.
  • Like a dog with a bone, noted homophobe and bully Conservative can't stop picking on teh gays. Today's obsession? Fat lesbians.
  • Let's look over the Breaking News section. We'll find that Andy proudly trumpets his "discovery" about Richard Dawkins, that RPK machine guns need to stay on the streets (where they belong), and that a single murder by a guy who happens to be a professor is justification for distrusting all professors. (this may induce [[Fun:Headdesk*Template:Mainpageright&oldid=343467 atheism is to blame]
  • Do you think SSchultz is bitter over the contest?
  • Suggesting that the Internal Revenue Service may be interested in the nefarious activities of the Wikimedia Foundation is fine. Suggesting that someone should report them, and a great victory be repeated, is silly."
  • "RobS guilty of liberal placement bias. "
  • "Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone, Prevent the dog from barking with a juicy bone, Silence the pianos and with muffled drum Bring out the coffin, let the mourners come." TK has been demoted...
  • That's not what the link says. The link says you were banned for sock puppetry.
  • Following ever increasing acrimony over Contest3, TK hands Andy his ball back and tells him to keep it.
  • [[cp:user:Aschlafly*User_talk:Aschlafly&diff=342650&oldid=342632 "I checked your talk page, and there was a complaint about your posting empty pages"], at this time the user's talk page did not exist!.[1] Another triumph for Andy's IQ.
  • Oh, dear. Because straight men never, ever do anything with young girls. Ever. Especially straight men who have dedicated their lives to God.
  • If they would read their own source, expenses of atheists and liberals include an executive director, an assistant, one-time office relocation, and consulting fees.
  • Lapdog Kenny goes looking for more approval from his master by begging the answer to the question of the moment. Also, his emails take "about a minute or two" to get to their recipients.
  • CP uses [[cp:Image:Graph1.png*It's been about a month and Conservapedia's article of the month still contains an empty section and a useless main picture. Note that there is no mention of Stalingrad.
  • Philip J. Rayment:"No one is branding anyone as atheists for believing in an old earth." Well, Almost no one. (Note that the great mind of Andy Schlafly does not reject an Old Earth because of the Bible, but because of "logic and science.")
  • Assfly is still trying to challenge the contest results two weeks later. Where is Katherine Harris at these days, anyways?
  • Isotopes have a liberal bias.
  • TK has a tough time putting up with reality. He HAS to be a parody account.
  • Andy creates an "Atheistic style" article. Atheistic style includes "a belief that atheists are somehow smarter than those having faith, downplaying contributions by Christians". Sound familiar? (On a side note, it would appear Andy doesn't believe in black holes, after all, people 100/1000 years ago didn't.)
  • Welcome to Andy's world, where correlation is causation
  • Andy indulges in a little lunacy to remove liberal bias. Because the second version is much less biased.
  • Ignorance is bliss.
  • WTF is this and this all about? It has all the hallmarks of Ken deMyer alias Peter Moore, alias Conservative, alias Newton etc. ad nauseam, masquerading as a sock. Oops, looks like someone trying to take TK down. Andy won't be shooting his pit bull anytime soon though, methinks.
  • Schlafly logic: 1. There is an unencyclopedic humorous cartoon in the Liberal article, as a new editor points out. 2. Andy has some concerns about its appropriateness. 3. Andy doesn't know who put it there, but 4. Whoever it was probably has a lot of edits. 5. As Conservapedia is a "meritocracy," people with many edits are automatically correct. So maybe if this new user gets as many edits as the unknown editor who posted the cartoon, that editor can remove it. But not until then. It's not the strength of the argument, its the edit count of who made the argument. That's how meritrocracies work. Godspeed. (P.S. The image was posted by CP's #1 Hitler Youth)
  • O RLY? I wonder if they can solidly grasp the difference between a million and a billion at Conservapedia?
  • Losing an argument? Have the last word by blocking your opponent for lastwordism.
  • Andy says MSNBC featured Conservapedia. Here is their full "feature": "Conservapedia.com is the religious right's response to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia"
  • Oh no, our homophobia is showing!
  • Conservapedia is now compiling an [[cp:Essay:Conservapedia*This is already on track to becoming a classic, and it's only going to get better.
  • PZ Myer's ponders the purpose of Conservapedia here.
  • Making up unverifiable stuff about dead guys is okay, so long as they're dead. Unverifiability is a virtue! Not that we'd expect anything else from creation "scientists."
  • TK settles it - anyone on the same internet service provider as a RationalWiki user is suspicious, and ought to be banned. That'll teach you to live in New York, and use one of its two major service providers!
  • MINE!
  • When Andy says "deleted information without justification", he really means "justification I don't like"
  • Richard Dawkins gets pwned! Now come on, that's just "insultive."
  • Conservapedia - it's "the fasted growing educational resource on the internet"! [2]
  • Did Andy pull a Conservative and not bother to read his reference?
  • Andy to student: "Wally, where have you been? You need to take the Midterm!" Oh, wait, TK blocked you a month and a half ago.
  • Fucking communist Indians! And TK-approved to boot!
  • Do not criticize the homosexuality article, even to point out that a 150kb, 16,000 word diatribe stretches the definition of "concise". And one minute later...
  • From the Spanish translation to the circular definition ("dizzy is a state of dizziness") to the shout out to Charlie Parker to the "Junk Science" tag, there's just so much Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrottery here...
  • Is Dawkins a professor? Well, to paraphrase Andy, that depends on what the definition of "is" is. Update: Even talking about Dawkins now is verboten!
  • While trying to prove that homosexuality is a choice, Conservative suggests that homosexuality is an inherent and unchangeable trait, brought on by abuse... Setting aside that this is sham science, note how Conservative lost his own argument, in his own essay. Winnar!
  • Andy highlinks a radio station's link to Constupidpedia on the mainpage.[3] Of course, Andy is too friggin' dense to realize the station is mocking Conservapedia.[4]
  • Andy's team got pwn3d in the latest contest (including having 3 members who made no contributions), so now he seeks judges to rig review the results.UPDATE - Still being the sore loser and feeling let down by his own homeskulers, Andy takes a leaf out of Dubya's book by seeking to remove thousands of registered voters points from the other team's score.
  • Wikipedia is better? Them's bullying words!
  • Should've known you couldn't run from the Dawkins debacle forever, Andy... The crushingly definitive reply finally arrives. Update Andy lives in his own little world.
  • Andy really shoots himself in the foot on this one. If he had bothered to read SSchultz's previous post he'd see the examples are there. Update: Oh snap, Andy... I guess he could.
  • Karajou jumps to conclusions about a possible sock. Apparently the Christian value of a family could make you ineligible to edit on CP.
  • Karajou stayed up all night thinking this doozy up! Needless to say, the aborted user's factual comment about abortion was aborted as well [[5]], despite being in the Talk page.
  • Breaking News occurs! ...in...um...1863.
  • Ed Poor connects the dots
  • TK masters the art of Schlafly statistics.
  • Like a sketch from Life of Brian, there appears to be a need for both "The Kingdom of Judah" and "Judah, Kingdom of". Thanks, Fox, for making CP a funnier place.
  • As always, the Contest brings out the best of everyone's abilities, as BrianCo gives himself 438 points for adding a shitload of unnecessary brackets to one of Andy's lectures. Really Brian, how does linking the words "Congress", "government", "question", and "law" 400 times each not make the article suck?
  • Ah yes, blacks' suffering is from abortion
  • This is some really weird categorization.
  • Yarghh, me hearties! According to CP, socialists are pirates (but unfortunately not ninjas).
  • Appearently, Liberals are Ducks.
  • What passes for a reliable source at Conservapedia? How about the blog Newsbusters citing the blog Marc Ambinder citing myspace.
  • TK predicts a user's beliefs just like his grooming mentor, and another user is quick to add a sarcastic comment about TK's prophecy. Annoyed, TK reveals a bit of personal info on the user's IP before blocking, but not before the user slaps him with actual (although uncited) facts.
  • Learn together has a new book he'd like to share with you, one page at a time.
  • We don't ask these types of questions around here, canadian troll.
  • Once again, Andrew Schlafly gets a massive tiny erection for dead college students.
  • CP endorses the idea that mandating [[Vaccine hysteria *Template:Mainpageright&curid=50481&diff=338052&oldid=337796 terrorism]
  • Warning! Conservapedia approaching hypocritical mass!
  • A valid question on the Midterms of an American History Class: "All of the following reasons explain why the media is so liberal EXCEPT:" Not to mention "34. So-called “hate speech” includes which of the following?" A, B, C, D are wrong. What's left? "(e) free speech that liberals seek to censor, such as criticism of homosexuality." [6]
  • Karajou gets the horn.
  • Although there are no words to describe how ridiculous this is, at least they have the opposite POV covered.
  • Medical breakthru! It is just liberal bias that Hepatitis B can spread from exposure to infectious blood or body fluids containing blood [7]. We should all open our eyes and see the truth! [8] Apparently, Andy is suffering from one of his periodic breakdowns.
  • Why is being from the UK worth noting in the block log?
  • There are more women applying to Brown University than men! A liberal conspiracy! Someone better take "critical thinking in mathematics" however because there are more women applying to college than men nationwide.
  • Apparently, being a CP sysop (or sub-sop) gives one the ability to read people's minds, and know their motivations.
  • So TK may be back from his little hissy fit, but apparently he's still taking out his anger on CP by making their articles into crap. That'll learn 'em! (they haven't noticed yet...)
  • I question Conservapedia's mathematical rigour
  • NATO didn't fight in Afghanistan. And nobody is fighting there now. Update: Apparently Tash doesn't mind giving comfort to th enemy afterall. What will TK have to say? Uncle Ed's little propaganda piece actually has the smallest hint of accuracy now.
  • It wasn't atmospheric conditions and moisture in the air that did it, It was Prayer.
  • YOU VILL NOT QVWESTION ZE SYSOPS UNDERSTAND!!!!!! UPDATE: Dat is Better
  • Does it somehow seem that Joaquin is posting this on the wrong site?
  • Lessee, 8-1=5, there, that oughta do it.
  • Sometimes, it's enough to say "you have no idea what you're fucking talking about"
  • Philip J. Rayment makes an entry into the Most Stupid Comment of all Time contest by claiming that prior to Darwin, the vast majority of people were creationists. I would like to add my own competing entry. How about "Until the invention of the internal combustion engine, the vast majority of people didn't drive cars".
  • Public schools should never threaten jail time for failing to vaccinate kids against diseases that aren't spread at public schools. Ah, the mindset of Assfly
  • Mauritius article copied directly from a wikipedia mirror. Pointing this out results in a block by Karajou for making a false accusation. Karajou admits he copied that from here without giving due credit, breaching CP Commanment 2. Once again proving that the Kommandmentz don't apply to sysops.
  • Some guy named [[cp:User:Fletcher*Talk:Main_Page&diff=next&oldid=335080 calls the CP mods] on their policy of disagreeing by deletion. Unsurprisingly, a mod disagrees by deleting. Annnd... he's blocked
  • Alleged human being TK takes his bat and ball and goes home. This must be a joke, right? Aww, man. Everyone put the champagne back. He returns.
  • RobS deleted a large number of personal attacks against Fred Phelps from another editor, despite being far more openly anti-Phelps and being the main one who calls him liberal. yet he censored his rant. Oh wait, it mentioned Mary Cheney, that's why.
  • Conservapedia doesn't demonize liberals, they simply react to reality. Need proof? Check out the Conservapedia Articles that'll clear it up
  • There's way too much trash here to mention.
  • Andy, in favor of blocking SSchultz for "gaming the system" gets 3 points for this edit to a "trustworthy" puerile blog "encyclopedia". Update: Andy does block SSchultz. Junk like that is not encyclopedic and not appropriate for Conservapedia! at least not when it's causing Andy to lose Update 2: SSchultz's response and a nice mention of us from lduan.
  • Its official, making useless edits is not a blocking offence. INTERESTING UPDATE: The referenced page (Crocoite's talk page) now has the sentence "Take a look at WIGO, (no link allowed)." WIGO is, of course, the abbreviation that we use here at RW for the page you are looking at now. ("What is going on [at CP]"). So it seems that the CP folks are now officially using that abbreviation for our page. But mention of RW itself is still strictly forbidden, hence the "(no link allowed)". Asking what WIGO is will still result in a block.
  • The truth about House MD is not acceptable.
  • CP sysops, who can't shut up for a minute about their retarded political views, now apparently find it rude and offensive to be asked about their political views.
  • TK tells it like it is. *Sniff* I'm so proud. But he forgets: Andy's team will win. There is no debating that.
  • ORLY?!
  • BethanyS displays her mastery of Lecture Linking - as does Brian.
  • It's important to have a separate [[cp:ozone shield*This apparently qualifies as a "quality edit".
  • Don't you love the copy and paste fest that CP team contests promote? Lets start by adding in terms used by the USDA. Way to go SSchultz! Odd I believe that a user was blocked for doing something like this... Perhaps it was because of ideological reasons? Hmmm, does CP stand for Copy and Paste? Update: Andy is not amused.
  • Non-participant Tash tries to hamstring the sysops in the upcoming cut-and-paste jamboree team contest, but Andy's reluctant. Probably because that's the only way he gets points.
  • Conservative: world's worst marketer. I wonder if he's considered that the article on homosexuality is so popular because it's on Wikipedia's article on Conservapedia, and on The Daily Show? I can bet that the article isn't popular because of its conciseness.
  • Well done, Ken, 7 out of the 10 most viewed pages on Conservapedia are about homosexuality. Let's help him out and get Homosexuality and Anal Cancer and Homosexuality and Illegal Drug Use into the top 10 to make it 9/10 and show CP for the great educational resource we know it to be. Update: It's 9/10 now!!! Way ta go, Ken! Update 2: Looks like people are finally taking notice of how popular Ken's creations are!
  • Another school shooting linked to atheism and evolution. Wait a minute, when was the last? And technically, due to the fact that a fairly large percentage of Finns are atheists (And, of course, a large percentage believe in evolution, they're not stupid. Cough.), it's not really that unlikely that a killer would be an atheist. Of course, when there are millions of creationists posting this online, there are also smart people refuting them. Then again, these people don't seem to know there's a difference between social Darwinism (Application of the theory of evolution to society... Not science, nor a part of the Theory of Evolution), and 'Evolutionism' (Which they basically suggest is knowing that evolution is true.) Oh, wait a minute, he called himself a realistic idealist. Oh no, the idealists must be part of this evil conspiracy too. Damn. Oh, wait, even better, they just got themselves pwnt.
  • Richard Dawkins must answer to Aschlafly.
  • Well, one thing that is going on is the crashing of the CP servers. Access has gone down since Jenga22 went rampaging through it just now. Call the FBI! Update:RationalResponders wandalized CP three times today - along with Jenga22, MichaelMcK and Melss both linkspammed to RR. Another enemy of CP crawling out of the woodwork? We report, you decide!
  • Andy thinks TK's schizophrenic aggression is funny. Yes, hilarious, and not the least bit disturbing... ha... ha...
  • Bullying only occurs at public schools. For Christ's sake....
  • Someone claiming to be Hillary Clinton shows up and confronts Conservapedia about their alleged lies against her. Maybe she will get the FBI after them. Update: Infamous name-dropper TK - "When Hillary brought over Danish this morning, she told me she had never registered!" - blocks the user. Update #2: the delusions reach a fever pitch!
  • What everyone needs every once and a while...
  • Sysops modify the rules for the contest preemptively to give themselves more points: TK's blocks (we know he can't write an actual article), Crocoite's breaking news, and Joaquin's image infringements.
  • The [[Conservapedia:FBI Incident*Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=TK&page= delete the talk page].
  • [[cp:user:Ed Poor*Talk%3ABullying&diff=330570&oldid=329873 teacher]. Be afraid, very afraid!
  • Oh my Gawd! Update. This user will be here soon.
  • This doesn't sound the least bit sexist way to go RobbieBoy
  • Two days in and they've managed to find a impressive thirteen contributors from the multitudes of non-banned editors on CP to take part in their [[Conservapedia:Team Contest three* The 2007 Writer's Strike is not being caused by complex financial issues and just compensation, it's the fault of whiny communists.
  • Check out Ed's condition for joining. Too true, too true.
  • Conservapedia gets it wrong again
  • Don't question someone else's opinion or else.
  • This edit summary pretty much sums up Conservapedia. (Better yet, Ed's link shows that Reagan beat the Soviets because the Force was with him.)
  • Conservapedia will NEVER block you for ideological reasons unless you use them as an excuse to tell the leader of the site to go home tonight and re-examine his conscience
  • Our sycophantically named friend Learn Together, er, tries to revert grammar mistakes.
  • I didn't know that being a serial butcher, an icon of evil and potential conservapedian sysop were requirements to be considered as part of the Anti-war movement.
  • In one of the most severe patterns of what-the-fuckery seen at CP, Andy again capitalizes on the death of 9 people.
  • The resident Creationist-In-Chief, PJR, again misrepresents the basics of evolution.
  • RobSmith: what the hell does this mean? Off the deep end much?
  • [Sir] Isaac Newton was a fucking Christian goddammit!
  • Niandra challenges Ken, calling his prize article "stale" :-O.
  • [[Roger Schlafly*Ann_Coulter&diff=next&oldid=329468 makes a correction] to RobS.
  • Folks, if we keep monitoring Conservapedia, we may end thinking like them. I feel Conservative was a very special kid.
  • Murder is consistent with atheist values.
  • Andrew Schlafly, scholar of Islam
  • Good job of showcasing not one, but two grammar, spelling, and usage errors. Bravo.
  • Capitalizing on death to make a political point - Schlafly redefines class.
  • Very interesting conservative author... though unknown to me.
  • Terry doesn't understand something? Why, then it must be parody. Meanwhile, those liberal fools at Wikipedia chose to maintain their parody article, with parody references too. UPDATE: Take THAT You lousy Brits! Update 2: Um...
  • France. Also, the Ukrainian Resistance never existed. Somebody break it to Bohdan.
  • With brains like yours Schlaflass, Computer Science and Math are advancing indeed!!!!
  • A "massive rework" takes 5 minutes, which was just another copy and paste job. Doesn't that say something about the original quality?
  • Goody! A non American school shooting, shall we make capital out of it?
  • Niandra's taking an axe to Ken's masterpiece! Oh the humanity!
  • What on earth is all this about? TK again demonstrates failure to understand basic Wiki markup. Update: he's getting angry. Rob, don't!
  • Ooooh, another university failed at something! Let's rejoice at people's failures! I bet they only failed because they were liberals, right, Andy?
  • Yes Ed, the only reason millions of Americans protested against a war that reintroduced conscription, saw the sovereignty of a nation undermined, resulted in the deaths of 1.4 million soldiers and up to 5 million civilians and saw numerous war crimes including massacres, rape and the destruction of entire villages was because of a successful propaganda campaign... And does anyone else see the irony that a foreign nation could win a civil war, which is by definition a war between two groups within the same country, elitism at its best
  • Terry corrects Andy's wikicode. Bannination in 5...4...3... oh, it's Terry. He could write an article about how the FBI found Jon Schlafly hidden at RationalWiki, and he'd only get praise for it.
  • "Yay! I'm super!" - Ed Poor. (By the way, most of Ed's 17 new articles are either one sentence or a blockquote. Way to go, Eddie.)
  • Conservapedia's article of the month is WWII, so we can learn how it happened. Thanks, Conservapedia!
  • When I get that feeeeeling, I need Sexual healing.
  • An apparent Domain name change.
  • Sly DanH removes sly wording from the Departament of Defense article. Take that, Ed Poor!
  • PZ Myers finds a way to make Conservative make sense.
  • While CP is sleeping with the fishes, Poor poor Ed goes to Wikipedia to create havoc. He has no life.

[[image:CPDown.jpg*"Conservapedia has a problem." Tell us something we don't know.

  • Ed makes a template everyone can find a use for.
  • Ed Poor, without any proof at all, blames us 3 times for Conservapedia's recent eight-hour downtime. Anytime now, I'm sure TK will be blaming us for his "wandering bladder." And, apparently, RationalWiki.info was created by us, and even if it wasn't, we better take it down, or Karajou's gonna come get us!!!1!!!1two!!!1 UPDATE: Assfly is not amused!!!11onehundredandeleven!!!1
  • The article on lesbianism becomes a part of the most hilarious category ever. Note that Wikipedia has an article on lesbian, but no article on lesbianism. LIBERAL BIAS.
  • In Andy's tiny mind repeatably hacking into a school server to change grades is on par with vandalising (ie posting the truth on) Conservapedia. And for someone who calls himself a lawyer Andy seems to fail to realise that hardly anyone who gets charged of a crime will be convicted and receive the maximum sentence
  • News flash! Conservative is sending you an email!!!
  • Having "liberal" in your user-name is a blockable offense, but having "conservative" instead is absolutely fine. A perfect example of a site which doesn't block for ideological reasons, right?
  • Ever up to the minute, can the CP's "Daily" Bible Verse and "Daily" Hysterical Quote make it to to eight weeks without being changed?
  • The contagion spreads, as another user shows symptoms of turning into Ken. First TK started using talk pages to announce that he's sent emails, then RobS takes 500 edits to add a couple irrelevant paragraphs to the Wikipedia article. Now Ed Poor shows off his skills at constructing articles made completely of block quotes. Is it something in the water?
  • PZ Myers personally lowers himself into the gutter to point out a blatant lie in CP's evolution article. Will Ken finally stop this nonsense about nobody pointing out lies or errors? Sure, and I have a bridge to sell you.
  • God help us all.
  • TK seems to have some objection to Ken using the main page as his personal blog. CP is Andy's blog, and don't you forget it! Update: Uh oh, edit war starting
  • Kenservative proudly inserts an "excellent source" provided to him by Andy into the ToE article. What could this "excellent source" be? Why, another crappy quote mine, of course!
  • The true spirit of online collaboration
  • How do you prove hype by the liberal media over chupacabra, when the link says nothing related to the claim? Another link that also shows no proof whatsoever.
  • Please stand by, we're processing Arabia
  • Not happy with smearing Dawkins on the [[cp:Richard Dawkins*Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&diff=327813&oldid=325631 now says] that WP "claims" that Dawkins is a professor. Apparently, Oxford University isn't a reliable source anymore.
  • Nothing is more Conservative than celebrating the deaths of illegal aliens. Update: Songs that seriously criticise America ("I don't need your war machines, I don't need your ghetto scenes,") and patriotism ("Some folks are born made to wave the flag, Ooh, they're red, white and blue.And when the band plays "Hail to the chief",they point the cannon right at you.) are great conservative songs. Maybe Maestro is hard of hearing. Or maybe he's just an idiot. UPDATE: HelpJazz removes the songs, giving no credit to RationalWiki for pointing out their flaws.
  • TK performs his own page count deceit by magically making Harry Potter vanish and reappear again, with zero page views. Taa-daa!
  • Has Ken finally taken heed of TK's admonition about obsessing over page counts? He hasn't updated his running stats page in over a week month.
  • This is hateful. This is not.
  • "Comments in block logs do not reflect any Conservapedia policy"
  • Ken deletes cp:Template:Mainpageright, maybe to break all our links or just hide his own edit history (?), so TK restores it, then posts this little note on Ken's doorstep. Please, please, please let this be TK Jihad Against Ken #3. Update He did it again!
  • Conservative is up in arms about PZ Myers not responding to CP's criticism of him, which he probably doesn't even know about, given that it's regarding comments made today for an entry made ten months ago. But more funny is his assertion that Myers is censoring an honest critic here because, get this, the user's posts are now being screened. Given that "Peter Moore" is obviously yet another guise for Conservative/Ken DeMyer, it was probably an anti-spamming measure. Update PWND!
  • The long awaited #25 in Aschlafly's 25 worst court cases EVER is... a rent control decision? Anti-climactic. Question: where's Plessy v. Ferguson on that list? Guess "separate but equal" is not so bad, after all.
  • Despite some elements CP trying to maintain the facade that the wiki welcomes people from all political viewpoints and religions TK finally reveals that it is only for the use of Christian conservatives and sums up his fascism here
  • Andy debates someone who agrees with him. I'm willing to bet $500, though, that Andy somehow finds a way to piss this new kid off. Pull up a chair & some popcorn and stay tuned. Update: It's on.
  • GregLarson and Aschlafly have a "touching" moment. Awwwwww shucks. Someday Greg's name is gonna be in lights. And TK must be green with envy.
  • Kajagoogoo writes an article copies an article from another website.
  • Human rights is a uniquely conservative issue. And yet Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are deceitful liberal organizations, right? Well, maybe the "conservative perspective of human rights" is that we should have less of them...?
  • TK's evidence for rejecting a call to amend an article, try linking to the article itself. And if that bit of circular logic wasn't enough consider that the original call was actually correct
  • Just observe this pearl of legal wisdom from Schlafly. I guess the right to privacy is not fundamental... for him.
  • Yep, no offence taken when someone refuses an unreasonable request, but still godspeed to you, and naturally no deceit in this
  • I hate to give up the game, but for Christ's sake - have no Conservapedians ever seen Austin Powers? This entry has been up since July and was edited today and still nobody has clued in. Schlafly, TK, Rob, Ken, Bethany - you are all very clueless individuals. Update Bless DanH, he tries so hard. [9]
  • Uh-oh, looks like someone is putting real science into the science articles. This won't last long.
  • Conservapedia is told how it is
  • Funny how "removing liberal bias" is actually just adding conservative bias.
  • Albert Andrew Einstein Schlafly adds a new, utterly exceptional and very practical article to Conservapedia.
  • CP, which maintains that just about everyone at Wikipedia is absurdly liberal, has a list of liberal Wikipedians, which consists of all of three people. Even more odd is that all three of them identify themselves as conservatives. Even more odd is that they measure how often the words "liberal", "conservative", "democrat", or "republican" appear on user pages, completely ignoring any context surrounding the word (ie, a list of representatives or an article draft). Editor's Note: this is wholly consistent with the [[Conservapedia:Liberal* BethanyS redirects an article, but doesn't bother improving the writing. Do you know the title of the first book?
  • Conservapedia: By Morons, For Morons. Who knew that American Indians aren't from India? Thanks for clearing that up!!
  • TK: dead? Well, we know at least that he's no fan of Hojimachong's anymore. Hmmmm.
  • A single instance of a tragic hate crime against a Christian in India (for which the murderer was convicted), is enough evidence for endemic violence towards Christians in India, enough to merit a mention on three separate pages, including its own entry. How many more countries can a determined CP editor finger for bias against Christians? Update: India also has it out for men. How can we tell? In part because the occupations of "receptionist, telephone operator, personal assistant, pre-primary school teaching etc. are dominated by women and men are widely neglected in these fields."
  • CP gets a tiny mention in an article about a completely different website... Kenservative's dreams are coming true!
  • Apparently, Fred Phelps is criticized by conservatives, but only by some liberals.
  • Talk about smearing by association, you'd think Al Gore made him do it...
  • Man, even I think these guys are douchebags. Finesse, gentlemen!
  • Ed Poor wikifies an article in the finest tradition of quality.
  • Survival of the fittest now also applies to talk page comments: Case in point (Of course, Colest is not amused)
  • Massive vandal attack [10][11].
  • Looks like Ed Poor is expecting Professional Wrestling to go the way of zombification.
  • Sure, Rob, no one ever called anyone "subhuman" over at CP. Certainly not TK. nope, never TK. No siree!
  • Hmm, hadn't noticed this before. Of course, TK knows best. What an idiot.
  • Homework answers: Younger and richer people are not real voters, church attendance is the best indicator of how somebody will vote, and, and, and. So much in there, you gotta read it yourself.
  • Dr. Sandstone knows how to write encyclopedic articles.
  • Cutting off editing after Andy's bed time shows how much CP activity is carried by people with a normal sleep schedule (EST); only one edit in the last two hours!
  • OH MY GOD! Hoji finally kicks the bucket and feeds Andy a piece of his mind. Then showdown between him and TK [12][13], but wait, does this mean TK was a parodist all along, as posted on the page of several sysops... well until DanH came along and tried to bury the evidence. Now the true end of the era (or at least for the next five years). What will happen next?
  • CP is not Wikipedia (you can say that again) where smears trump logic. Therefore, CP will continue to defend a neo-Nazi against protesters in order to make liberals look bad. Oh, and we'll block the guy who tried to tell us it was a bad idea. I guess they really are competition for M*t*fpedia after all.
Retrieved from "https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Conservapedia:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F/November_2007&oldid=1617849"