Conservapedia talk:Andy Schlafly on Eagle Forum Live/segment 1

Posted preliminary transcript. Require verification on 2 segmentsat the location marked [Verification needed]. Feel free to remove stuttering as well. The [Beep] is an actual beep due to telephone malfunction when Andy tries to say Conservapedia (Even the phone censors him). [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 03:48, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I'll give a quick proofread/listen. And I'll add a footnote about the "beep". Thanks for getting one loaded up, by the way! ħuman 18:49, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Fonts

Phyllis should be in Fraktur, and Andy in Comic Sans. --127․0․0․1 06:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Not everyone has this "Fraktur" font. Candlewick 19:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Not everyone has this "Comic Sans" font either. --127․0․0․1 19:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

How can you not have Comic Sans?! I'm running XP SP1 and I have it.

I also checked my WinBook XP (which runs Windows 95), and that also has it! Except it's named Comic Sans MS.. but it's still the same. Candlewick 21:17, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, everyone has the Microsoft fonts. Except for those damn marxist communists that is. --127․0․0․1 22:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, but bold, italic, and green work everywhere... except for the color-blind. Oops. ħuman 21:48, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Aw, for glaven out loud. You people are too serious about it all. It wasn't an actual suggestion, but it would be an apt choice. Whatever, get back to your important work. --127․0․0․1 22:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I know it was a joke... only part I found odd was that you didn't use the fonts in your suggestion... ħuman 22:13, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

That's because I am a marxist communist. --127․0․0․1 22:17, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

copyright

We ain't gonna get into a copyright thing with Phyl are we? Warren Terra 17:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I think that would be a thorny issue for her to proceed with. "Copyright extremists are working to control as much information as possible. Almost every week we see a new example of how they are thwarting the free flow of information." [1] The general stance of Eagle Forum is anti-copyright except for creative works and that should be for 14 years as orginally framed in the constitution. Transcript of a freely aired conversation would fall outside their definition. I have to say that I actually have a good deal of sympathy with their position. I believe copyright laws have been extended unduly and should be no longer than is awarded for a patent (currently 20 years). Генгис^{You have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.} 18:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Wow, so it's not all insanity over there. This is an eminently sensible stance. --127․0․0․1 19:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

As long as we end up commenting, it's fair use. Also, I did notice when grabbing the raw mp3s that there is no obvious copyright notation on their site. ħuman 18:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I did a site search for copyright and only found their bitchings about it. The closest thing to a copyright statement is "REPRINT POLICY: We allow the copying or reposting of our articles as long as full credit is given to the author and Eagle Forum." Генгис^{RationalWiki GOLD member} 18:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Want to save me some trouble and paste that over the copyright notices I put on the 19 mp3s? ħuman 19:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I put it on the main article, thanks for the research. ħuman 19:13, 27 June 2009 (UTC)