Conservapedia talk:Andy Schlafly on Eagle Forum Live

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The announcer's comment about needing more content on the PS article doesn't appear in segment 1. Redchuck.gif Генгисpillaging 18:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I fixed it. It's at the end of segment 2. 1 & 2 are really two halves of one long bit, so my notes were prior to my chopping it in half... ħumanUser talk:Human 19:10, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Is it just me, or does it always sound like Phyllis says "welcome to the pogrom"? ħumanUser talk:Human 02:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Veiled anti-semitism...? Once all the segments are transcribed, will we get rid of the "transcribed" notices next to them as it won't be necessary since all of them will be done? SJ Debaser 14:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Well, I still hear it as "program" but I get it like the Alpha program or other mind-bending course. Redchuck.gif Генгисunbelieving 15:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
SJ, yes, that's what I was planning on doing. For now they just help us figure out what needs doing. ħumanUser talk:Human 20:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Or pilgrim, since it sound almost exactly the same as that word (allegedly it is pilgrim, but it can be progrom or program) in segment 2. [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 13:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

And I just did it. Wow, you guys kick ass, I can't believe all the transcribing is done already. ħumanUser talk:Human 23:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Now what? Should these transcripts be on one page to make reading them easier? What sort of snark are we going to add? Redchuck.gif ГенгисRationalWiki GOLD member 11:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Well done on everyone who transcribing! I dunno about snark. I like teh entries we have describing the segments atm. SJ Debaser 12:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Go easy on the congratulations, there are some people who are a bit miffed that they didn't any. Redchuck.gif ГенгисRationalWiki GOLD member 13:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
GK, it's pretty easy to click through them using the prev/next links, they load quickly. As far as snark, I see no reason not to add "Commentary" sections after the transcriptions. And next comment, what "didn't any" mean huh? ħumanUser talk:Human 21:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
My bad, it should have been "didn't get any". Redchuck.gif ГенгисIs the Pope a Catholic? 05:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Get any to transcribe? Congratulations to them, too, for caring, for reading, for being on the internet, and for being alive. Sorry if I left anyone out! ħumanUser talk:Human 06:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Maybe someone format it to be like a side-by-side? That may look easier to add comments. [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 03:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
I had thought of that, but really, there's no need. Each transcript is only one screen at most (on my awesome monitor anyway). Just add comments below I think. And don't add a zillion "in line" ref-style jokes, they are really hard to read. Just add critique in a section below the transcript. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
K, sorry, I didn't mean to say "no". But shall we say, if one has a good idea for side-by-side, edit that one segment to do it and add the commentary? GK, re "Should these transcripts be on one page to make reading them easier?" Yes, I will build that by transcluding them all onto one extra special magic subpage. Maybe even tonight. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[UI] GK I did what you asked, see "the third way" link. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:29, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Transcripts format[edit]

Not to complain about the good work of those who put them together, but does anyone else think it would be better to make use of the quotebox template instead of the normal/bold/italic/PJR formatting currently used. I think the quotebox format works great on things such as Conservapedia:The Zeuglodon Blues. Is there away someone with a bit of geek savvy could make the changes using a bit of regex rather than me doing each edit manually? DeltaStarSenior SysopSpeciationspeed! 18:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)