Conservapedia talk:Best of Conservapedia

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This Conservapedia related article has been awarded SILVER status for quality. We like it, and you should too! See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.


Archives for this talk page: , (new)


First sentences:

"Cuba is a prison island located in the Caribbean Sea, 90 miles south of "Freedom" aka Florida.

It is the only Communist apartheid tyranny in the Western Hemisphere and is considered the worst dictatorship in this world. Its former high level of freedom and prosperity was destroyed by the evil dictator Fidel Castro. "

And they call it pedia ?

What the hell?[edit]

Why is "balls" listed here, and why does it apparently have a score of 186?! I would normally assume stuff like this is vandalism, but I have no idea how to vandalize an automatically maintained archive, nor how to fix it. Wehpudicabok (talk) 10:14, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, what IS up with all the 'Balls' entries? This is automated so it shouldn't be possible to rewrite? DogP (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Not funny[edit]

By describing events on conservapedia as worse than they are (the bias gradually grew probably because no one dared admit it was logically possible), and using humor as an apparent excuse for the misrepresentation, this page looks less neutral than conservapedia articles themselves.

I know that reading biased material for prolonged durations will cause one to write biased material to describe the biased material (who wants to be unfairly burdened by an obligation to be neutral?) so I cannot say that I wouldn't have done the same. But it's a much stronger disillusionment when learning of flaws from real dialogue without attributing the disillusionment to the opinions of RationalWiki. (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Definition of oxymoron[edit]

'Best of Conservapedia' Anna Livia (talk) 10:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

If you noticed the "Create Account" button gone on CP[edit]

Karajou if bothered enough has now resorted to blocking the creation of any new users. Feel free to delete, or tell me a better place to document this. — Unsigned, by: Cpbasher / talk / contribs