Conservapedia talk:Great Disenchantment
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Does this really need a name and an article? We have enough made-up rules and little terms and labels for things.--Tom Moorefiat justitia 06:13, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- ....Sayeth the Great Naysayer. -- =w= 06:14, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- It is crap, but it is in Conservapedia space so it is crap I don't care about. Not worth an article really, but who cares? - π 06:19, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- I was gonna say sorta what Pi said. It's not mainspace, so it doesn't matter. Anyway, it was a pretty big deal for people who sleep with print copies of CP under their pillows. ħuman 06:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough.--Tom Moorefiat justitia 06:25, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- I thought it was pretty interesting - as the latest stunt of an amusing parodist. Come on now, who among you doesn't love MarkGall? -- =w= 06:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- (E/C)It's a bit better now but still pretty rubbish. If there's any more fallout from today's events it might just be worth keeping. –SuspectedReplicantretire me 06:36, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- It needs a lot more links to show why these people "mattered". And quotes, or sumthin. ħuman 06:38, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- I tried to make it better. I am pretty sure I missed a couple of replies, though.--Ireon 11:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Any thoughts on adding an "About Mark" section here? I don't think his antics are written up anywhere and seems like it might be useful to give some context on this page. --Benod 05:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- I like that idea. I wouldve writ it already, but I'm lazy and ignorant. -- =w= 05:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's not like he's going to have a big writeup anywhere else. -- =w= 05:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- I thought it was an interesting article. I don't really follow the goings on at CP that much so it's nice to be brought up to date from time to time.--BobNot Jim 07:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is it wrong that I now have a mad crush on Kate?-- -PalMD --Do not read my blog 01:46, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hehe, not at all, we all do/did. ħuman 02:08, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is it wrong that I now have a mad crush on Kate?-- -PalMD --Do not read my blog 01:46, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- I thought it was an interesting article. I don't really follow the goings on at CP that much so it's nice to be brought up to date from time to time.--BobNot Jim 07:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Any thoughts on adding an "About Mark" section here? I don't think his antics are written up anywhere and seems like it might be useful to give some context on this page. --Benod 05:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- I tried to make it better. I am pretty sure I missed a couple of replies, though.--Ireon 11:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- It needs a lot more links to show why these people "mattered". And quotes, or sumthin. ħuman 06:38, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough.--Tom Moorefiat justitia 06:25, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- I was gonna say sorta what Pi said. It's not mainspace, so it doesn't matter. Anyway, it was a pretty big deal for people who sleep with print copies of CP under their pillows. ħuman 06:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- It is crap, but it is in Conservapedia space so it is crap I don't care about. Not worth an article really, but who cares? - π 06:19, 18 November 2009 (UTC)