There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Conservapedia talk:Legal Errors on Conservapedia
No. 2 doesn't read right. Shouldn't it say "asserts" rather than "disputes"? --Horace 22:51, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
- Hasn't Andy assumed that legal precedent in the US applies to other countries? Or did I hallucinate that? --Kels 22:54, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
Find the cite! I bet he did. He's really unimpressive, for a Harvard Magna grad... -AmesG 22:59, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
- Honestly, you've got a better eye for it than I do. I was a legal secretary for some years, but that's about the extent of my knowledge. But I suspect he thought the statute on internet vandalism had international application. His understanding of it certainly got a lot of faults, so it wouldn't surprise me. --Kels 23:03, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
What about a section on their interpertation of the mail fraud laws for prosecuting vandals? Those always cracked me up. And if we could get a report on the outcome (aside from the FBI laughing and probably forwarding the complaints around the office) that'd be great because I'm very curious how it was treated. Jrssr5 11:46, 1 June 2007 (CDT)
Me too. I just got banned again while trying to pursue the issue today. If a complaint has been ACTUALLY submitted to the Cinncinati FBI office, shouldn't that fact at some point become part of the public record? Doggedpersistance 18:36, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
red links[edit]
I deredded a bit, but left the court cases linked. Will there be articles on them? I note that one mentioned is not linked, so I assume it is not articleworthy? humanbe in 19:55, 16 September 2007 (EDT)