Information icon.svg The 2019 RMF board election has started!
We are electing 3 board members for the 2019-2021 term.
Vote here and read their campaign slogans here!

Conservapedia talk:Legal Errors on Conservapedia

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

No. 2 doesn't read right. Shouldn't it say "asserts" rather than "disputes"? --Horace 22:51, 24 May 2007 (CDT)

Hasn't Andy assumed that legal precedent in the US applies to other countries? Or did I hallucinate that? --Kels 22:54, 24 May 2007 (CDT)

Find the cite! I bet he did. He's really unimpressive, for a Harvard Magna grad... -AmesG 22:59, 24 May 2007 (CDT)

Honestly, you've got a better eye for it than I do. I was a legal secretary for some years, but that's about the extent of my knowledge. But I suspect he thought the statute on internet vandalism had international application. His understanding of it certainly got a lot of faults, so it wouldn't surprise me. --Kels 23:03, 24 May 2007 (CDT)

What about a section on their interpertation of the mail fraud laws for prosecuting vandals? Those always cracked me up. And if we could get a report on the outcome (aside from the FBI laughing and probably forwarding the complaints around the office) that'd be great because I'm very curious how it was treated. Jrssr5 11:46, 1 June 2007 (CDT)

Me too. I just got banned again while trying to pursue the issue today. If a complaint has been ACTUALLY submitted to the Cinncinati FBI office, shouldn't that fact at some point become part of the public record? Doggedpersistance 18:36, 13 July 2007 (CDT)

red links[edit]

I deredded a bit, but left the court cases linked. Will there be articles on them? I note that one mentioned is not linked, so I assume it is not articleworthy? humanbe in 19:55, 16 September 2007 (EDT)