Conservapedia talk:On liberalism

I'm not sure you really want this article, or at least the links to the same sort of pages on your own site. Its a bit hypocritical. DoggedamesP 20:09, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Nice try, Bohdan. But this is vs. this, and our ones are parody of their's. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן ^{שְׁלֹום}

Wikinterpreter/ed, what was I trying? They have liberal behavior, you have creationist behavior, and so on. Don't you see the problem? DoggedamesP 20:45, 25 February 2008 (EST)

No.-- -PalMD ^{--Yee haw!} 20:52, 25 February 2008 (EST)

[1]. DoggedamesP 21:03, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Where do we generalize about the group of creationists, aside from the fact that their "science" is objectively wrong? Where do we accuse them of being unable to feel emotions?-αmεσ (historian) 21:08, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Your page is just as mocking as you say theirs is. DoggedamesP 21:14, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Satire ( rationalwiki) VS. satan/santa/serious (conservapedia). Try to grasp the difference in impact and intent. Or is satire a purely liberal concept? There is an article idea for Andy. Andy, that's for free. I give it to you because the sacred two-headed elephant god is love ( and it this particular divinity is bringing sexy back . . . .) Gods are love Andy, Gods are love. ^{Exasperate me!}Sheesh!_{I said what?} 04:51, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Question. I remember, definitively, Andy calling me a "smart liberal." I'd like to note that I'm a rare combination :-). It was early, when I'd just joined I think. But I can't find it. Does anyone remember that?-αmεσ (historian) 01:38, 1 March 2008 (EST)

I don't remember that, Ames, and I suspect Liberal deceit on your part. I have seen many sources state quite clearly that Liberals can't be smart. If they were smart, they'd be Conservatives. And homeschooled. But not necessarily at home. Godspeed. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 08:26, 1 March 2008 (EST)

Rainbow

Why the Rainbow's included   ^Contribs_Talk 05:21, 18 June 2008 (EDT)

What I thought. When liberals use real phenomena as symbols to represent concepts, its called deliberate redefinitioin to obfuscate the truth. NightFlare^{Still doesn't have a (nonstub) RWW article.} 09:31, 18 June 2008 (EDT)