Draft talk:Defamation

Under section 230 a website owner can be prosecuted? What are the circumstances of that? I was under the impression that Canadian law was more allowing of this. See [1] Ostwelt Spangler (talk) 13:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

It would be appreciated if editors could discuss the subject rather than the bizarre nonsense from Arcticos. Ostwelt Spangler (talk) 14:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Probably difficult though. All things considered. — Dysk (contribs) 15:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Ostwelt Spangler (Mikemikev) specialises in defamation

Rightpedia was shut down by their web host after Mikemikev posted defamatory content, is that why he's now asking these questions?Arcticos (talk) 13:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Unlikely because that really isn't what got Rightpedia shut down. It was quite a different matter indeed. — Dysk (contribs) 13:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

GoDaddy confirmed the removal was because of obscene images of dead Palestinian children Mikemikev posted on articles to smear Jews. He was posting those photos with another admin named Wyatt to defame ordinary Jewish people as child killers, who have nothing personally to do with the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. And the smear is psychological projection since Mikemikev supports child murder.Arcticos (talk) 14:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, defamation had absolutely nothing to do with it. It was a content issue. — Dysk (contribs) 15:17, 26 February 2019 (UTC)