There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Essay talk:Of Pandas and People
Shouldn't this be in user space or essay space? Pomegranate (talk) 05:28, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- You must have read the n00b guide quick to have spotted that ;) - π 05:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yah, I'm a quick study, thanks. This wiki seems to have well-organized noob and help pages, not hard to get up to speed. Pomegranate (talk) 06:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- We do, sort of, have a "review" space that could do with some entries.
moral 06:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- If there are no objections, I'll move it to Review:Of Pandas and People.
moral 18:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- We do? Tmtoulouse (talk) 19:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, there are a few marked "Review:..." not sure if it's a proper namespace, as such.
moral 19:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well, not any more since this move. But I certainly favour organising these by "Review:" rather than any other method.
moral 19:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well, not any more since this move. But I certainly favour organising these by "Review:" rather than any other method.
- Yeah, there are a few marked "Review:..." not sure if it's a proper namespace, as such.
- We do? Tmtoulouse (talk) 19:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- If there are no objections, I'll move it to Review:Of Pandas and People.
Which edition?[edit]
Of course, the difference in editions is important frequently hilarious - David Gerard (talk) 19:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Could this essay be adapted into mainspace?[edit]
It seems very well written (at a glance), and our main article on Of Pandas and People is very slim indeed. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 02:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)