There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Essay talk:On the importance of being wrong
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Eyyy. I like the science parts.
But I'm not sure I think the religion point is valid.
Should we have Holocausts every now and then just to remind us how bad they are?
If not, then why have smaller-scale atrocities and logical failures that religion so often brings? Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 15:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- IFF you ignore the arguments I said I was ignoring for the sake of argument. I do not actually consider those points invalid. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 15:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)