There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Fun talk:Argument from molarity
This article(solution) is named this way to contrast Argument from morality(source). [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 15:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- I am really thinking of moving this to fun... ĴάΛäšςǍ₰ I saw a salad fork around here... 15:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed.
ListenerXTalkerX 16:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- And there I was thinking it'd be about chemistry. Totnesmartin 17:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, it needs a lot more chemistry jokes. "Solution" alone is not enough. And, yeah, agree with the move to "fun" - ironically, if it gets funnier, I'd support it here in the mainspace. ħuman
01:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, it needs a lot more chemistry jokes. "Solution" alone is not enough. And, yeah, agree with the move to "fun" - ironically, if it gets funnier, I'd support it here in the mainspace. ħuman
- And there I was thinking it'd be about chemistry. Totnesmartin 17:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed.
Ironically, the "argument from molarity" already exists, and it's the refutation of homeopathy. Sadly, this article crashes and burns in terms of actually saying anything. Why don't we just delete it? ħuman 04:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)