Fun talk:Argument from molarity

This article(solution) is named this way to contrast Argument from morality(source). [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 15:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I am really thinking of moving this to fun... ĴάΛäšςǍ₰ no hell below him 15:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. ListenerX^TalkerX 16:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

And there I was thinking it'd be about chemistry. Totnesmartin 17:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, it needs a lot more chemistry jokes. "Solution" alone is not enough. And, yeah, agree with the move to "fun" - ironically, if it gets funnier, I'd support it here in the mainspace. ħuman 01:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

I didn't even realise it had jokes, I thought the title was misspelt. - π 02:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Is there an argument from molality as well? Corry 03:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Ironically, the "argument from molarity" already exists, and it's the refutation of homeopathy. Sadly, this article crashes and burns in terms of actually saying anything. Why don't we just delete it? ħuman 04:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

I plead no contest. [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 10:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

I mean no meanness, but let's enact a mercy killing on this for now. ħuman 04:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I plead for its banishment to fun.--Bob^{Not Jim} 13:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)