There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Fun talk:Conspiracy theories
Speaking about symbolism[edit]
Why so brief? Satanism is just such a damn hot subject you know. — Unsigned, by: Hex4 / talk / contribs
The real conspirators[edit]
Are the sheeple, who manage to combine polite indifference at best to the dire warnings offered, and persist in concern troll type 'problem raising' and #somehow# manage to avoid any of the consequences the theorists proposes. (And some of them manage to write best selling fiction based on the theories) Anna Livia (talk) 17:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Where[edit]
Are the 'fun conspiracy theories' - the ones which are actually fun? Anna Livia (talk) 17:30, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- They don't want you to know. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 17:47, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Three men walk into a pub…[edit]
…and They want you to believe it was “just a coincidence”! WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!1!!eleven! Mr Larrington (talk) 18:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)