RationalWiki's 2020 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2120Goal: $3500

Fun talk:Evil Jew (satire)

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

please dont have this page, even if it is satire Bohdan 23:26, 13 July 2007 (CDT)

If the sterotype is what you're worrying about, let it be hereby known that I find this page amusing. --Linus(plot evil tech) 23:15, 20 December 2007 (EST)
Ha I made that comment 5 months ago. You may find it amusing, but others won't. user:Bohdan 23:17, 20 December 2007 (EST)
Ever watched Spaceballs? Same principle :). --Linus(plot evil tech) 14:37, 21 December 2007 (EST)
I find it not amusing that this article claims that having a large nose is criminal. That is highly demeaning towards people who have large noses through no fault of their own. This should be fixed. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 09:21, 21 December 2007 (EST)

how's this?...it IS satire remember[edit]

Not really, it's just a bunch of over-the-top nonsensical stuff that isn't even well-written. The stuff in the original list is satirical 'cause it's playing off of long-established stereotypes, and it's good satire 'cause it's well-put-together. The new section just sounds like a cheap imitation of an imaginary racist. But whatever, I ain't gonna edit-war over it. BbMaj7 On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog. 21:18, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete[edit]

Any page that has to put a "(satire)" tag on itself is self-evidently not funny. Delete this crap. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 21:36, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

+1. Röstigraben (talk) 21:53, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I think there is room somewhere for satire that plays on teh big, important stereotypes that have achieved a certain amount of longevity and are thereby sort of cebtral to the gestalt. I'm not convinced this is that article. BbMaj7 On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog. 21:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
The room for playing on stereotypes would be the stereotype article. This is decidedly not funny enough. ADK...I'll acidify your crack whore! 22:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)