2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Fun talk:Playing cards

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Move[edit]

Should we move this to "Playing cards"? The article (and indeed general parlance) talks about the pack as a whole. Pedantically sticking to the singular is just silly. cf Zombies. Sophiebecause liberals 15:28, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

  • It is very important that it remain at the current title because of, er... um... reasons. Because. *Curses! she's got me!* EVDebs (talk) 18:10, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Fun-o-nize?[edit]

I for one say YES!!!m--'Legionwhat do you want from me 19:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Tarot card games[edit]

There are a few of them to be found on the web - and in a SF novel I read long ago some of the characters were playing three-handed tarot poker. Anna Livia (talk) 18:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)