Fun talk:Proof God is Always Right
We are getting a nice traffic spike from social bookmarking, rather not have new people just see a "this page is deleted" message. We can revisit it later. tmtoulouse 18:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Fairy-snuff. It can get funnerized later.
gnostic 17:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Traffic spikes are nice, but wouldn't it be better if users coming into page saw some actual wiki content rather than just two pages with a dozen words or so each which just link back to each other? We've got quite a lot of articles related to this subject we could link to in them. Wèàšèìòìď
Methinks it is a Weasel 18:46, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'd be in favour of redirecting to a more relevant, but also humourous page? Dalek (talk) 19:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Just looking round twitter, fb & general blogs, the mentions seem to have dropped off about 3-4 days ago. If anyone can betterify it then go ahead. 19:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- I've shifted it to fun but left all the redirects intact as they'll be useful to stop any incoming links going dead. Probably could do with a bit more work. gnostic 19:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- I've shifted it to fun but left all the redirects intact as they'll be useful to stop any incoming links going dead. Probably could do with a bit more work.
- Just looking round twitter, fb & general blogs, the mentions seem to have dropped off about 3-4 days ago. If anyone can betterify it then go ahead. 19:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'd be in favour of redirecting to a more relevant, but also humourous page? Dalek (talk) 19:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Traffic spikes are nice, but wouldn't it be better if users coming into page saw some actual wiki content rather than just two pages with a dozen words or so each which just link back to each other? We've got quite a lot of articles related to this subject we could link to in them. Wèàšèìòìď
Question[edit]
Anyone care to do a 'God is always wrong' article? Select whichever gods you fancy. Anna Livia (talk) 14:58, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Some scientific evidence[edit]
https://www.deviantart.com/joeypelobello/journal/109-Evidences-for-a-Young-Earth-and-Universe-877322036 (URL will change over time due to I updating it)
Joseph D. Pelobello/Daniel William "Danny" Willson 05:06, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- That listicle is neither scientific, nor is it evidence. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 12:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
My unified creationist theory[edit]
User:Joseph D. Pelobello \ Daniel William "Danny" Wilson/Unified Creationist Theory
This is a "scientific" theory I devised, uniting various theories on the Earth and its origins, such as young-Earth creationism, flood geology, plate tectonics, expanding earth, and those posited by Zecharia Sitchin.
It will come over the coming weeks (I may be busy due to school etc.)
Stay tuned!
Joseph D. Pelobello/Daniel William "Danny" Wilson 20:49, 24 July 2021 (UTC)