There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Fun talk:RW Bureaucrat Purity Test
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I should Like to Point Out that I For One do not think this is Funny.--Tolerance (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- I get 7/10 at most. Professor Moriarty 21:09, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Number #5 is outdated and needs to be replaced. Summa Atheologica (talk) 14:15, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- This is ten years old. and we haven't even had bureaucrats since 2011, so that's hardly the biggest issue. Avida Dollarsher again 14:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)