There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Ann McElhinney
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ann McElhinney | Result: Speedy deletion[edit]
Keep[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Ad hominem, no citations, no links. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 03:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with FuzzyCatPotato. Not only should this article be deleted, but it should be recreated. McElhinney is certainly an enemy of science and of nature, but she nonetheless deserves a better article than the current one.In Dawkins we trust (talk) 03:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- On-mission subject matter, terrible article. 141.134.75.236 (talk)