Information icon.svg Our Community Standards are under review. Your comments and inputs are welcome on the relevant project talkpage.

RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Log

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Articles for Deletion main page

Childfree movement | Result: ?[edit]

Childfree movement (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD)

Delete[edit]

  1. Off-mission, does not describe any of the hard-green woo that much; way too much editorializing. Antinatalism is already covered in its own article. --Goatspeed. Stalk meCircularREmail2.gifasoningSteal my ideas 19:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
  2. See CR. Kevlarstar and his dog (Woof!) 13:14, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

Merge/redirect[edit]

  1. Convert into a subsection in the article on antinatalism. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 19:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
    Nah, I think it's hopelessly biased, and largely keeps trying to convert the reader to the cause. --Goatspeed. Stalk meCircularREmail2.gifasoningSteal my ideas 20:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
    @CircularReasoning That would be why you'd convert it into a subsection. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:52, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Goat[edit]

Draft:Communist glossary | Result: ?[edit]

Draft:Communist glossary (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD)

Delete[edit]

  1. Heavily biased, features way too much pro-communist editorializing that is hopelessly off-mission, instead trying to defend and promote a far-left ideology that is good on pen and paper, but doesn't work in practice. --Goatspeed. Stalk meCircularREmail2.gifasoningSee what I'm planning 01:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
    Citation needed. What does "work" even mean? It's such a perfectly vague word. Oxyaena Harass 18:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
  2. Unless the pro-commie shit is purged and it's drastically improved, I'm voting for deletion. Twodots (talk) 01:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
    What pro-commie shit? Oxyaena Harass 18:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. It is missional, as communist states are notoriously fundementalist (obey the party line or be purged) and authoritarian. It needs to be expanded and many Marxist terms can be considered to be pseudo-scientific. Tuxer (talk) 01:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
  2. It's currently a draft. It's not currently a problem. Just don't let into mainspace in its current state. Easy and done. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
    Addendum. How the fuck is this pro-USSR? If anything it's fucking critical of the USSR. What the fuck have you dipshits been smoking!?!?! ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
    Seriously, @CircularReasoning, please explain to me how this draft is "pro-communist". Please!! ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:11, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
  3. Let's keep things interesting!-Flandres (talk) 18:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
  4. Not offensive enough to delete. Draft needs more depth in it's examples though to avoid unintentional apologetics. Sirius (dog star / Pencil.png / Tux icon.png / Shield.png) 18:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
  5. Plenty of room for solid topics - think of phrases like "rootless cosmopolitan" or "bourgeoisie revisionism" that were (and are, if you're in China) bandied about a ton. IveBeenFrank (talk) 18:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
  6. This could be pretty useful eventually. Communism has so many fucking branches and so much fucking jargon, and i think it would be worth having a reference. 🎄Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano🎄Ask about our holiday specials! 19:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]

  • What the hell happened to this page? It seems to have started as a general far left glossary (which would have been useful) and then @Tuxer seems to have renamed it to Communist ideology and pruned most of the examples they wrote. Proposing restoring this to left wing glossary with the previous examples instead of this. Sirius (dog star / Pencil.png / Tux icon.png / Shield.png) 18:21, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
    I say we put it out of its misery. It has so much commie shit that basically listed a whole bunch of reasons why the middle class don't know what kind of government they want and why Karl Marx does that it should've been AFD'd long ago. --Goatspeed. Stalk meCircularREmail2.gifasoningSee what I'm planning 18:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
    Yeah, let's nuke the bastard! Twodots (talk) 18:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
    You're both idiots. A thing with six entries is somehow worthy of deletion? For that matter, we should have a liberal glossary, since liberalism is just as wack as "muh communism." Oxyaena Harass 18:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
    Hell, it's critical of the USSR. What have you clowns been smoking? The liberal kool-aid? Oxyaena Harass 18:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
    Has anybody else noticed that Oxyaena dedicates more energy towards criticizing "liberals" than she does conservatives, fascists, and libertarians?-Hastur! (talk) 18:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
    Centrists are just as much a problem as Nazis and conservatives, albeit for different reasons. Neoliberal capitalism brought us Trump in the first place. That's a fact. Oxyaena Harass 19:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
    Also, I love how you nitpick one part and ignore the rest of my point. Oxyaena Harass 19:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
    What point? The same one I made right below?-Hastur! (talk) 19:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
  • 6 entries, is in draft space-Hastur! (talk) 18:35, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Matthew Rushin | Result: ?[edit]

Matthew Rushin (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD)

Delete[edit]

  1. I don't see the missionality in this subject. Perhaps a mention in Black Lives Matter and/or autism rights movement would suffice. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 22:50, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
    I'm not sure if I can vote on the subject, but I agree. The article also lacks reliable/unbiased sources and fails to properly cover the permanent incapacitation inflicted on the victim, so even just including it elsewhere might not be appropriate. UninspiringNickname (talk) 20:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  2. Covering individual instances of our criminal justice system failing us is stretching the authoritarianism aspect of our mission.-Hastur! (talk) 07:16, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. Article is reasonably written and sourced and missional. ShabiDOO 07:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  2. Keep - Don't find the article interesting, but its probably interesting to some people Neiltyson1fan (talk) 07:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Merge/redirect[edit]

  1. Merge with the relevant articles. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 22:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
  2. IMO this should be merged with our BLM article, where appropriate; it doesn't seem that missional. --Goatspeed. Watch meCircularREmail2.gifasoningSee what I've been messing around with 18:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
  3. Integrate in other relevant articles. Sirius (dog star / Pencil.png / Tux icon.png / Shield.png) 13:03, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  4. Yeah, makes more sense as part of a greater article-Hastur! (talk) 07:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
  5. Somebody should merge it, there are more votes for merge and it started in December. Kevlarstar and his dog (Woof!) 13:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Goat[edit]