RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Log

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Articles for Deletion main page

Women's Human Rights Campaign | Result: ?[edit]

Women's Human Rights Campaign (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) โ€“ (View AfD)

Delete[edit]

  1. Has a grand total of 17,000 followers worldwide and Twitter followers numbering in the lower quadruple digits; obscure groups as scummy as these degenerates don't even deserve the free clout from an RW article. Also, 98% of this was made by an insufferable, overly-passionate, holier-than-thou editor who has a very shitty track record when it comes to editing. --Goatspeed. Stalk meCircularREmail2.gifasoningMy experiments 18:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
  2. Full of misinformation on specific living people that weโ€™ve already deleted a lot of other articles over, not worth saving. Christopher (talk) 18:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]

1984 U.S. presidential election | Result: ?[edit]

1984 U.S. presidential election (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) โ€“ (View AfD)

Delete[edit]

  1. Not very good, stub for 2+ years. Gale5050 (talk) 20:59, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
  2. Christopher (talk) 21:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
  3. Dubiously needed. Will just turn crufty. Maybe a collection of historical US presidential elections as a single article could be useful, but this is not one of the more interesting kinds. Techpriest (talk) 11:39, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
  4. Achieves nothing. ๐’ฎ๐‘’๐“‡๐‘’๐“ƒ๐‘’ talk 12:32, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
  5. I'm not convinced that articles about long-ago elections really fit the mission all that well. What purpose does this serve? Avida Dollarsher again 12:53, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
  6. -Flandres (talk) 13:34, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
  7. Monet talk 18:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
  8. Hopelessly tiny stub, would be better off as a section in our Ronald Reagan article or something. --Goatspeed. Stalk meCircularREmail2.gifasoningSee my latest prototypes 18:09, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. I'm sure Flandres and/or Plutocow would love to expand the article. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
    If either of them actually posts here indicating that they really will expand the article, I will consider changing my vote to keep. ๐’ฎ๐‘’๐“‡๐‘’๐“ƒ๐‘’ talk 12:32, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
    Flandres does not want to expand.Gale5050 (talk) 13:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]

  1. You know, if the majority of the RW mob didn't topic-ban me, perhaps I could've expanded these types of stubs so that they wouldn't get nominated for deletion. Just saying. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 04:14, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
    You can always appeal it. Gale5050 (talk) 12:09, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
    Expand them with inaccurate garbage like you usually do? It's better to just delete them at that point.-Flandres (talk) 13:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)