There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Ban Bossy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ban Bossy | Result: Deleted with extreme prejudice[edit]
Delete[edit]
- It's shit. <-𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈-> (talk) 19:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- It's an interesting topic to discuss, perhaps even say some missional stuff about in an article. Just not this current article. 142.124.55.236 (talk) 19:47, 24 September 42015 AQD (UTC)
- If it's true as the article claims that [this] has "recieved enormous amounts of criticism", it should be easily beefed up to full size. If that is true. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:51, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- It received a moderate amount of right wing criticism. Not like "trigger warning" or "politically correct" levels of losing their heads, but... really only hitting a few actual publications. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 19:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Still worth to have a page on IMHO. But obviously not this turd. Carpetsmoker (talk) 21:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- It received a moderate amount of right wing criticism. Not like "trigger warning" or "politically correct" levels of losing their heads, but... really only hitting a few actual publications. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 19:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Wēāŝēīōīď
Methinks it is a Weasel 20:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)